Thanks Lookinup2011:
By: tuscan9
18 Oct 2011, 02:40 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 1042258 of 1042293
Jump to msg. #
THIS is TIME related SEC clue for us
Nev West is the only crook Broker/Dealer that the DEC
WANTS to list on the SEC site as a guilty party in Naked
Shorting cmkm.
This has STAYED in the public EYE and todays DATE 10/18/11
has FINALLY and quite perfectly become a done deal.
its always appeared to me that this is where our F&P smaller
amount would come from VIA the GOVERNMENT/SEC and THEN at the TIME they wanted to get'er done they could TOUT to the world that the SEC has CLEANED up the CROOKS..(notice TDW,eTrade,Ameritrade and none of the other brokers EVER got listed in the wrongdoings of cmkm..just NevWest which imo, NO ONE in the public will recognise as a scary
thing... they will just assume some bodink broker got caught.
Think wayyyyyyyyy back on the days we were DDing mining..and miscreants..and happy to see articles on the internet about CEO/CFO/COO getting picked up for wrongdoing. Needless to say, those SEC arrests never hit the headlines of the newsPAPERS or tv media at THAT TIME..but my big suspicion has always been that the DAY this finally all hits the fan the SEC will go back and SHOW the public all of the arrests made yearsssssss ago.. 6-7 years worth.. and brag they were doing a STING on the Broker boyz and money madness. ...and the public will not think a thing EXCEPT that this is now a OK time to GET BACK IN THE MARKET... its all cleaned up cause the SEC and gov sez so !!
so, I think we arrived, finally, at that TIME...
let the fun begin..................and WE, cmkx'ers who sat here watching each and every arrest and perp walk for all these years
DO KNOW the REST of The STORY !!
lets watch how this all lines up... according to the script..
(sure working into my script to the 'T') ps..we are now on pg 153..lol
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 65584 / October 18, 2011
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-14592
In the Matter of
Sergey Rumyantsev,
Respondent.
ORDER INSTITUTING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Sergey Rumyantsev (“Rumyantsev” or “Respondent”).
II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.2 below, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
2
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
1. Rumyantsev was the CEO and head trader at NevWest Securities Corporation (“NevWest”), then a broker-dealer registered with the Commission, from at least January 1, 2002, until April 13, 2006. Rumyantsev was also one of four members of the Board of Directors of NevWest, which had policy-making authority. Rumyantsev holds Series 4 (registered options principal), 7 (general securities representative), 24 (securities principal), 27 (financial and operations principal), 53 (municipal securities principal), 55 (equities trader) and 63 (state securities) licenses. Rumyantsev, 41 years old, is a resident of Las Vegas, Nevada.
2. On August 1, 2011, after the Commission’s motion for summary judgment against Respondent was granted, a final judgment was entered against Rumyantsev, permanently enjoining him from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77e, and additionally permanently barring him from participating in an offering of penny stock, in the civil action entitled SEC v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:08-cv-00437-LRH-RJJ, in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
3. In granting the Commission summary judgment, the Court concluded, among other things, that the following facts were uncontroverted: (a) while CEO of NevWest, Rumyantsev allowed NevWest to acquire and distribute newly issued unregistered stock certificates representing billions of shares of stock of CMKM Diamonds, Inc., a Nevada corporation, from which the restrictive legends had been improperly removed by CMKM’s transfer agent; (b) Rumyantsev allowed an individual associated with CMKM to open more than thirty different brokerage accounts at NevWest in more than thirty different names, while using the same social security number for most accounts, for the sole purpose of trading the unrestricted shares of CMKM stock, which were sold in several unregistered distributions between December 2002 and September 2004.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent Rumyantsev’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act that Respondent Rumyantsev be, and hereby is:
barred from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization; with the right to apply for reentry after five years to the appropriate self-regulatory organization, or if there is none, to the Commission.
Any reapplication for association by the Respondent will be subject to the applicable laws and regulations governing the reentry process, and reentry may be conditioned upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the satisfaction of any or all of the following: (a) any
3
disgorgement ordered against the Respondent, whether or not the Commission has fully or partially waived payment of such disgorgement; (b) any arbitration award related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order; (c) any self-regulatory organization arbitration award to a customer, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order; and (d) any restitution order by a self-regulatory organization, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary
Read more:
cmkxhottub.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=2026#ixzz1bAa26tmh
