Post by particleswaves on Oct 10, 2005 5:48:43 GMT -6
financialwire.net/articles/article.asp?analystId=0&id=19179&topicId=160&level=160
October 10, 2005 (FinancialWire) If the charges against Gradient Analytics by three former employees, Rocker Partners and TheStreet.com (NASDAQ: TSCM) in the Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) naked short selling flap turn out to be true, it could be a Richter magnitude earthquake whose aftershocks could leave three key financial industries in rubble.
An undermining of confidence in the “independence” of subscription-based institutional research, in the financial media that could even involve General Electric’s (NYSE: GE) CNBC and of course, the undeniable clout of already besieged hedge funds and the “King of Shorts,” David Rocker, whose targets are said to include Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (NYSE: MSO), would be disastrous in the event of any one of them, but altogether, it could result in a total collapse as investors look for safer investment and savings venues than “crooked” markets.
In a commentary, Motley Fool said any “mirth” regarding “sith lords” and other irrelevant allegations are “obscuring a case with fairly broad implications for security analysis, First Amendment rights, and the credibility of our public markets.”
It said that in an affidavit recently acquired by The Motley Fool, and also apparently acquired by DealFlow and others, Demetrios Anifantis, who identifies himself as a former employee of the research firm Gradient Analytics, alleges that the company conspired with David Rocker of the hedge fund Rocker Partners to publish damaging information "for the purpose of negatively influencing the price of Overstock shares so that Rocker could profit from its existing or intended short positions in Overstock shares.
“Two additional sworn statements in our possession, ostensibly by former Gradient employees Robert Ballash and Daryl Smith, also allege that Gradient provided biased research on behalf of its clients. Both Anifantis and Ballash additionally accuse Gradient of running a hedge fund advisory called Pinnacle Investment Advisors, contrary to the company's public statements at that time.”
Motley Fool notes “the most detailed and apparently most damaging affidavit, if it is true, was delivered by Anifantis. He worked as a customer service representative for Gradient from November 2003 until November 2004. New York Post reported that he was fired from the research firm for forwarding his employer's client list to his personal email.
“According to his statement, Anifantis recalled being on phone discussions, during which "David Rocker, Marc Cohodes, or other representatives of a hedge fund called Rocker Partners, LP, requested that the special report contain more negative information, or that the report emphasize a specific negative fact and that the report downplay any positive facts.
“Anifantis also states that customers like Rocker would ask that Gradient not disseminate a negative report ‘to the public for a specific period of time, so the customer could get their own position in the stock before the public got the information.’ This conspiracy went beyond just Vickrey and Rocker, according to Anifantis, who also says that it "appeared" to him that Herb Greenberg, who then wrote for TheStreet.com, joined in coordinating the attacks on Overstock.
“At first glance, the affidavits raise troubling questions about the nature of ‘independent research.’ If the three former employees of Gradient are telling the truth, the alleged conspiracy between the research firm and Rocker Partners would represent an egregious example of market manipulation, which most likely would have seriously harmed individual investors, as well as Overstock itself.”
The Fool points out that “the veracity of these individuals has not been established, and Rocker Partners and Gradient vigorously deny the charges.
“As New York Post has reported, at least two of the affiants may have credibility issues or reasons to hold grudges against Gradient. If this case makes it to trial, Anifantis, Ballash, and Smith will have to testify in court and withstand cross-examination by top defense attorneys. It will be interesting to see whether their charges are supported by documentary evidence, such as emails, revised reports, notes of phone calls, and the like. Within the affidavits are charges that would prove quite persuasive if supported with concrete documents.
“For example, in support of the charge that Rocker had considerable input on the creation of reports, Anifantis's affidavit refers to an "exhibit 5" (which we did not receive) allegedly containing revised reports on Overstock with Rocker's revisions in brackets.
“Ultimately, we believe that these affidavits raise important questions for investors about the integrity of our financial system. Unlike a lot of the silliness in the media relating to Overstock, this complaint is not frivolous on its face, and although Overstock will need to prove its allegations, the case must be taken seriously. The question to us is why the atmosphere around this lawsuit has, from the beginning, been comical. If the behavior set forth in these allegations is true, then the implications of the ease at which the financial professionals can manipulate the public markets are stark.”
Overstock has been on the Regulation SHO list, the government’s official list of illegal fails to deliver, for “only” 114 days, far less than 32 other companies. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (NYSE: MSO) and Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (NYSE: KKD), among others, have been on the list for 186 days. Legally, trades are supposed to settle within a few days time.
The affidavits, from former employees of Gradient, according to DealFlow state that the research firm provided “hatchet jobs” on companies chosen by clients “coordinated to deliver maximum trading benefits to them.” The affidavits state that reporters for TheStreet.com “leaked” Gradient’s negative reports to the market ahead of their release. It notes that Rocker Partners is the largest shareholder in TheStreet.com and that Rocker is a contributing columnist. The affiants also say that former TheStreet.com columnist Herb Greenberg had an office at Gradient where he ghost-wrote research reports for Gradient clients such as Rocker.
The former employees, one of whom had been fired after raising questions about Gradient’s practices, said the firm stated its team of 18 to 20 analysts were comprised of CPAs and CFAs when none of them had advanced credentials, and were instead recent college graduates with business-related degrees.
They also note that the research firm’s executives, Donn Vickery and James Carr Bettis, also managed hedge funds and a mutual fund that traded in the securities of companies covered by the research side.
If so, this, among the other allegations, is a violation of the “Standards For Independent Research Providers” at www.firstresearchconsortium.com.
Gradient is a member of InvestorSide, which has provided it and other member research providers with a seal that “certifies” its research is “free of investment banking conflicts.” It is not clear if running a hedgefund would violate that certification, and no one was available at InvestorSide over the weekend to comment on whether charges such as have been leveled at Gradient would disqualify such a research provider from its membership.
Former employee Demetrios Anifantis, in a sworn statement, said that Gradient would regularly generate “custom reports” for clients, after receiving specific instructions from the clients on whether it should be a “negative” or “positive” report.
Many of the reports were redistributed to PIPES traders and hedge funds by Sagient Research, which distributes the Placement Tracker database of PIPES transactions. Sagient reportedly said it has not distributed Gradient reports since August, 2004. Release dates on the reports were said to have been often delayed for three to five days while Rocker and other Gradient partners secured short positions. These allegations were contained in several affidavits.
The affidavits said that an associate editor working with Greenberg, now at Marketwatch.com, Brian Harris, worked for Gradient to draft research, and had an office in a Gradient office in Seattle. It was noted that TheStreet.com removed Harris’ name as an associate editor shortly after Overstock’s lawsuit was filed.
The affidavits contain numerous other explosive allegations.
In other naked short selling developments, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., reportedly itself under NASD scrutiny for its controversial stock lending program that some, including an 11 state state North American Securities Adminitrators Association task force headed by Connecticut’s chief securities officer, and former NASAA president, apparently believe facilitates the illegal naked shorting industry, has been very secretive about the status of shares for individual companies, stonewalling even companies’ efforts to determine their true ownerships and short positions.
Brokerage and clearing firms are apparently under intense NASD pressure to settle failed short trades in Regulation SHO threshold securities or have their clearance firms do it for them at possible substantive losses.
The NASD is in turn acting under political and regulatory pressure from the 11-state task force.
Lambiase had publicly asked the SEC to “fix” the DTCC “problem” as it was considering the adoption of Regulation SHO last year, but taking a page from numerous U.S. Senators, he and other state regulators have grown tired of waiting for Regulation SHO to do more than simply shine a magnification light on the massive fails-to-deliver problem.
DealFlow said NASD officials are concerned that stock loan programs are being used to settle failed short trades in Reg SHO threshold stocks, which must be closed out voluntarily or through forced buy-ins within 13 days. “The regulators are concerned that the stock loan are being used instead of market purchases to provide the shares needed for settlement, creating new transactions that will ultimately fail to settle as well.”
The state regulators, DealFlow said, have been “highly critical of the SEC's decision to ‘grandfather’ settlement failures resulting from naked short sales up to levels that trigger threshold status under Reg SHO.”
NAASA was particularly concerned about Regulation SHO, because it excluded the small cap market from any meaningful regulation. “NASAA said the proposal included replacing the so-called ‘tick test’ with a rule that would provide a uniform price test using the "consolidated best bid" as the reference point for permissible short sales. This, however, would not address problems relating to the naked short selling of smaller, less liquid securities, because , NASAA argued, the requirement of the consolidated best bids meant it could not be applied to securities that were not subject to real-time consolidated quotes. That included Nasdaq Small Cap, OTCBB, and Pink Sheet securities.
NASAA also questioned the wisdom of grandfathering settlement failures under the threshold level, asking why the SEC was willing to permit significant settlement failures at all.”
“While there are instances when settlement may be legitimately delayed, existing regulations provide for extensions for settlement. If the Commission continues to allow settlement failures, it may well facilitate the harm that the proposal is designed to remedy,” Lambiase warned the SEC.
According to DealFlow, Lambiase urged the SEC to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the stock borrow program operated by the Depository Trust Corp. (DTC). NASAA wrote that as a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The utility of the overall proposed rule would be severely impaired unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition."
Brent Baker, an attorney with Woodbury Kesler in Salt Lake City and counsel to naked shorting target and eight-month old threshold list company Overstock.com, previously spent 14 years at the SEC, including time in the Division of Enforcement, was quoted as saying he believes that the SEC tried, with Regulation SHO, to put "their finger in the dike" but failed.
“Three or four years ago naked short selling was being perpetrated by promoters in the micro cap world," he says. "they would publish 'exposes' on the Internet... and they would bring pressure on these little companies."
“However, short selling has changed,” noted DealFlow. He believes the SEC does not realize that abusive short selling practices have been adopted by others and are now built into business models of large, mainstream hedge funds.
Meanwhile, the NY Post has reported that traders in Nasdaq stocks are racing to beat a rumored regulatory deadline to close out their positions — or take huge losses as clearing firms do it for them.
“Naked short sales are trades executed without borrowing stock beforehand. Naked short sellers can overwhelm an orderly trading market, since unlike traditional short sellers, there is technically no limit to how much stock can be sold short illegally, noted the Post.
The Post also reported recently that the NASD and numerous state securities regulators, led by Ralph Lambiase of Connecticut's Division of Securities and Business Investments, have vowed to increase scrutiny of naked short sales.
“A buy-in is the worst possible development for a short-seller, since he has to accept any price given,” it stated.
It seems that everytime the DTCC, which is also the target of numerous lawsuits brought by failed companies and a scorching expose in Investment Dealers Digest, gets under pressure, it begins striking out blindly in all directions. FinancialWire can often determine when the heat has been turned up because it is among the media, also thought to have included Dateline NBC, that begins to receive threats from the organization.
In February, the DTCC interfered with FinancialWire’s distribution to Investors Business Daily, and in the past week it sought once more to interfere with another distribution, saying that FinancialWire receives monies for its editorial coverage of the naked short selling issue.
Marshal Shichtman, Esq., attorney for FinancialWire, has been in touch with Proskauer Rose, the outside counsel for the DTCC, warning it of slander, tortuous interference with FinancialWire’s business and because the DTCC is owned by two SROs, the NASD and the NYSE, of First Amendment violations.
Shichtman will be similarly warning the SROs and the directors of the DTCC of what he terms their risks associated with the ruthless, reckless and irresponsible actions of their clearance entity.
(continued next)
October 10, 2005 (FinancialWire) If the charges against Gradient Analytics by three former employees, Rocker Partners and TheStreet.com (NASDAQ: TSCM) in the Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) naked short selling flap turn out to be true, it could be a Richter magnitude earthquake whose aftershocks could leave three key financial industries in rubble.
An undermining of confidence in the “independence” of subscription-based institutional research, in the financial media that could even involve General Electric’s (NYSE: GE) CNBC and of course, the undeniable clout of already besieged hedge funds and the “King of Shorts,” David Rocker, whose targets are said to include Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (NYSE: MSO), would be disastrous in the event of any one of them, but altogether, it could result in a total collapse as investors look for safer investment and savings venues than “crooked” markets.
In a commentary, Motley Fool said any “mirth” regarding “sith lords” and other irrelevant allegations are “obscuring a case with fairly broad implications for security analysis, First Amendment rights, and the credibility of our public markets.”
It said that in an affidavit recently acquired by The Motley Fool, and also apparently acquired by DealFlow and others, Demetrios Anifantis, who identifies himself as a former employee of the research firm Gradient Analytics, alleges that the company conspired with David Rocker of the hedge fund Rocker Partners to publish damaging information "for the purpose of negatively influencing the price of Overstock shares so that Rocker could profit from its existing or intended short positions in Overstock shares.
“Two additional sworn statements in our possession, ostensibly by former Gradient employees Robert Ballash and Daryl Smith, also allege that Gradient provided biased research on behalf of its clients. Both Anifantis and Ballash additionally accuse Gradient of running a hedge fund advisory called Pinnacle Investment Advisors, contrary to the company's public statements at that time.”
Motley Fool notes “the most detailed and apparently most damaging affidavit, if it is true, was delivered by Anifantis. He worked as a customer service representative for Gradient from November 2003 until November 2004. New York Post reported that he was fired from the research firm for forwarding his employer's client list to his personal email.
“According to his statement, Anifantis recalled being on phone discussions, during which "David Rocker, Marc Cohodes, or other representatives of a hedge fund called Rocker Partners, LP, requested that the special report contain more negative information, or that the report emphasize a specific negative fact and that the report downplay any positive facts.
“Anifantis also states that customers like Rocker would ask that Gradient not disseminate a negative report ‘to the public for a specific period of time, so the customer could get their own position in the stock before the public got the information.’ This conspiracy went beyond just Vickrey and Rocker, according to Anifantis, who also says that it "appeared" to him that Herb Greenberg, who then wrote for TheStreet.com, joined in coordinating the attacks on Overstock.
“At first glance, the affidavits raise troubling questions about the nature of ‘independent research.’ If the three former employees of Gradient are telling the truth, the alleged conspiracy between the research firm and Rocker Partners would represent an egregious example of market manipulation, which most likely would have seriously harmed individual investors, as well as Overstock itself.”
The Fool points out that “the veracity of these individuals has not been established, and Rocker Partners and Gradient vigorously deny the charges.
“As New York Post has reported, at least two of the affiants may have credibility issues or reasons to hold grudges against Gradient. If this case makes it to trial, Anifantis, Ballash, and Smith will have to testify in court and withstand cross-examination by top defense attorneys. It will be interesting to see whether their charges are supported by documentary evidence, such as emails, revised reports, notes of phone calls, and the like. Within the affidavits are charges that would prove quite persuasive if supported with concrete documents.
“For example, in support of the charge that Rocker had considerable input on the creation of reports, Anifantis's affidavit refers to an "exhibit 5" (which we did not receive) allegedly containing revised reports on Overstock with Rocker's revisions in brackets.
“Ultimately, we believe that these affidavits raise important questions for investors about the integrity of our financial system. Unlike a lot of the silliness in the media relating to Overstock, this complaint is not frivolous on its face, and although Overstock will need to prove its allegations, the case must be taken seriously. The question to us is why the atmosphere around this lawsuit has, from the beginning, been comical. If the behavior set forth in these allegations is true, then the implications of the ease at which the financial professionals can manipulate the public markets are stark.”
Overstock has been on the Regulation SHO list, the government’s official list of illegal fails to deliver, for “only” 114 days, far less than 32 other companies. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (NYSE: MSO) and Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (NYSE: KKD), among others, have been on the list for 186 days. Legally, trades are supposed to settle within a few days time.
The affidavits, from former employees of Gradient, according to DealFlow state that the research firm provided “hatchet jobs” on companies chosen by clients “coordinated to deliver maximum trading benefits to them.” The affidavits state that reporters for TheStreet.com “leaked” Gradient’s negative reports to the market ahead of their release. It notes that Rocker Partners is the largest shareholder in TheStreet.com and that Rocker is a contributing columnist. The affiants also say that former TheStreet.com columnist Herb Greenberg had an office at Gradient where he ghost-wrote research reports for Gradient clients such as Rocker.
The former employees, one of whom had been fired after raising questions about Gradient’s practices, said the firm stated its team of 18 to 20 analysts were comprised of CPAs and CFAs when none of them had advanced credentials, and were instead recent college graduates with business-related degrees.
They also note that the research firm’s executives, Donn Vickery and James Carr Bettis, also managed hedge funds and a mutual fund that traded in the securities of companies covered by the research side.
If so, this, among the other allegations, is a violation of the “Standards For Independent Research Providers” at www.firstresearchconsortium.com.
Gradient is a member of InvestorSide, which has provided it and other member research providers with a seal that “certifies” its research is “free of investment banking conflicts.” It is not clear if running a hedgefund would violate that certification, and no one was available at InvestorSide over the weekend to comment on whether charges such as have been leveled at Gradient would disqualify such a research provider from its membership.
Former employee Demetrios Anifantis, in a sworn statement, said that Gradient would regularly generate “custom reports” for clients, after receiving specific instructions from the clients on whether it should be a “negative” or “positive” report.
Many of the reports were redistributed to PIPES traders and hedge funds by Sagient Research, which distributes the Placement Tracker database of PIPES transactions. Sagient reportedly said it has not distributed Gradient reports since August, 2004. Release dates on the reports were said to have been often delayed for three to five days while Rocker and other Gradient partners secured short positions. These allegations were contained in several affidavits.
The affidavits said that an associate editor working with Greenberg, now at Marketwatch.com, Brian Harris, worked for Gradient to draft research, and had an office in a Gradient office in Seattle. It was noted that TheStreet.com removed Harris’ name as an associate editor shortly after Overstock’s lawsuit was filed.
The affidavits contain numerous other explosive allegations.
In other naked short selling developments, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., reportedly itself under NASD scrutiny for its controversial stock lending program that some, including an 11 state state North American Securities Adminitrators Association task force headed by Connecticut’s chief securities officer, and former NASAA president, apparently believe facilitates the illegal naked shorting industry, has been very secretive about the status of shares for individual companies, stonewalling even companies’ efforts to determine their true ownerships and short positions.
Brokerage and clearing firms are apparently under intense NASD pressure to settle failed short trades in Regulation SHO threshold securities or have their clearance firms do it for them at possible substantive losses.
The NASD is in turn acting under political and regulatory pressure from the 11-state task force.
Lambiase had publicly asked the SEC to “fix” the DTCC “problem” as it was considering the adoption of Regulation SHO last year, but taking a page from numerous U.S. Senators, he and other state regulators have grown tired of waiting for Regulation SHO to do more than simply shine a magnification light on the massive fails-to-deliver problem.
DealFlow said NASD officials are concerned that stock loan programs are being used to settle failed short trades in Reg SHO threshold stocks, which must be closed out voluntarily or through forced buy-ins within 13 days. “The regulators are concerned that the stock loan are being used instead of market purchases to provide the shares needed for settlement, creating new transactions that will ultimately fail to settle as well.”
The state regulators, DealFlow said, have been “highly critical of the SEC's decision to ‘grandfather’ settlement failures resulting from naked short sales up to levels that trigger threshold status under Reg SHO.”
NAASA was particularly concerned about Regulation SHO, because it excluded the small cap market from any meaningful regulation. “NASAA said the proposal included replacing the so-called ‘tick test’ with a rule that would provide a uniform price test using the "consolidated best bid" as the reference point for permissible short sales. This, however, would not address problems relating to the naked short selling of smaller, less liquid securities, because , NASAA argued, the requirement of the consolidated best bids meant it could not be applied to securities that were not subject to real-time consolidated quotes. That included Nasdaq Small Cap, OTCBB, and Pink Sheet securities.
NASAA also questioned the wisdom of grandfathering settlement failures under the threshold level, asking why the SEC was willing to permit significant settlement failures at all.”
“While there are instances when settlement may be legitimately delayed, existing regulations provide for extensions for settlement. If the Commission continues to allow settlement failures, it may well facilitate the harm that the proposal is designed to remedy,” Lambiase warned the SEC.
According to DealFlow, Lambiase urged the SEC to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the stock borrow program operated by the Depository Trust Corp. (DTC). NASAA wrote that as a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The utility of the overall proposed rule would be severely impaired unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition."
Brent Baker, an attorney with Woodbury Kesler in Salt Lake City and counsel to naked shorting target and eight-month old threshold list company Overstock.com, previously spent 14 years at the SEC, including time in the Division of Enforcement, was quoted as saying he believes that the SEC tried, with Regulation SHO, to put "their finger in the dike" but failed.
“Three or four years ago naked short selling was being perpetrated by promoters in the micro cap world," he says. "they would publish 'exposes' on the Internet... and they would bring pressure on these little companies."
“However, short selling has changed,” noted DealFlow. He believes the SEC does not realize that abusive short selling practices have been adopted by others and are now built into business models of large, mainstream hedge funds.
Meanwhile, the NY Post has reported that traders in Nasdaq stocks are racing to beat a rumored regulatory deadline to close out their positions — or take huge losses as clearing firms do it for them.
“Naked short sales are trades executed without borrowing stock beforehand. Naked short sellers can overwhelm an orderly trading market, since unlike traditional short sellers, there is technically no limit to how much stock can be sold short illegally, noted the Post.
The Post also reported recently that the NASD and numerous state securities regulators, led by Ralph Lambiase of Connecticut's Division of Securities and Business Investments, have vowed to increase scrutiny of naked short sales.
“A buy-in is the worst possible development for a short-seller, since he has to accept any price given,” it stated.
It seems that everytime the DTCC, which is also the target of numerous lawsuits brought by failed companies and a scorching expose in Investment Dealers Digest, gets under pressure, it begins striking out blindly in all directions. FinancialWire can often determine when the heat has been turned up because it is among the media, also thought to have included Dateline NBC, that begins to receive threats from the organization.
In February, the DTCC interfered with FinancialWire’s distribution to Investors Business Daily, and in the past week it sought once more to interfere with another distribution, saying that FinancialWire receives monies for its editorial coverage of the naked short selling issue.
Marshal Shichtman, Esq., attorney for FinancialWire, has been in touch with Proskauer Rose, the outside counsel for the DTCC, warning it of slander, tortuous interference with FinancialWire’s business and because the DTCC is owned by two SROs, the NASD and the NYSE, of First Amendment violations.
Shichtman will be similarly warning the SROs and the directors of the DTCC of what he terms their risks associated with the ruthless, reckless and irresponsible actions of their clearance entity.
(continued next)
, it sounds pretty damning for shorty. 
yes pretty wild eh.
