|
Post by suzyq on Oct 5, 2005 13:57:36 GMT -6
“The SEC has refused public information requests more often than almost every government agency and department, including the CIA and Pentagon, according to a survey.
Of 3,830 information petitions received from lawyers, investors and others under the Freedom of Information Act, the SEC has granted only 34%. The survey was conducted by the Coalition of Journalists for Open Government. The SEC’s year-end backlog of 8,635 requests was also larger than all except four agencies.”
“The SEC did not decide on 93% of over 9,000 requests received in its last fiscal year, and is totally jammed up now.
Global Securities Information said it had filed over 9,000 FOIAs and now has a backlog of over 6,000 pending.”
Considering the above information from a news-service...
I've been wondering how Pedro has broken through the quamire at the SEC and received his FOIAs???
It just struck me as odd???
Regards, SuzyQ
|
|
|
Post by mineralsrus on Oct 5, 2005 14:10:26 GMT -6
WOW! Great DD and questions..hmmmmmm I would love to know this as well. Maybe he left because his mission is over.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2005 14:10:50 GMT -6
I believe the stuff Pedro has been posting has been part of the public record of the hearing on this action. Therefore, all he had to do was pay for a transcript of the proceedings.
It's the ones that don't come to court that get hidden behind the foia.
The record of SRCI's 2002-2004 action is still being denied on the basis that it would have a negative impact on an ongoing investigation... But then, there was never a hearing in open court.
|
|
|
Post by wwjdthrume on Oct 5, 2005 14:48:45 GMT -6
I believe the stuff Pedro has been posting has been part of the public record of the hearing on this action. Therefore, all he had to do was pay for a transcript of the proceedings. It's the ones that don't come to court that get hidden behind the foia. The record of SRCI's 2002-2004 action is still being denied on the basis that it would have a negative impact on an ongoing investigation... But then, there was never a hearing in open court. Excellent response Brigantine. The Shareholders through Frizzell were denied the trading records for CMKX that the DTCC has to indicate the size of the short. The DTCC denied that request. Give me a break. Shareholders deserve to know this nominal bit of information. We already know more than they want us to know, we just need the records to prove that we are right in the basic assumptions that most of the posters here have made about CMKX. -IMO-Debi
|
|