|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 6, 2018 12:15:21 GMT -6
☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆  Now... How long did you say we have to wait for the mail man?? Bring us some lemonade ... sugar in mine... Beary wants his without please.
☆ ........ got news for us ??
☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
Watching for the mailman ...... 
☆ Just waiting... Got news for us?? ☆ |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 6, 2018 12:16:18 GMT -6
I've got nuttin'
Who woulda thought 2018??
|
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 9, 2018 3:20:16 GMT -6
Yes. $0.23/sh initial payment only for Fines and Penalties. Plus more to come later! - sammy Fines & Penalties is MORE THAN $.23 cents/sh $.23 cents is first small payment before F&P Lets just receive Notification and enjoy from there Harv Let's pray it is true this time ... |
|
|
|
Post by stockrocker on Jan 9, 2018 15:47:16 GMT -6
:)any idea of timeline?  jim/SR |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 10, 2018 15:09:41 GMT -6
An oldie.....Dec 27, 2010 Hello All~ I had a friend translate this. He is fluent in English and Italian. It should be easier to read with proper English, for all of us. Here it is as follows: Dear Friends: Last night I was in contact via skype with a very close friend of Al Hodges. She is a very sweet and kind Italian woman, and she tried to explain to me what was going on here without sharing many confidential details. As I think you understand, this story involves so many "powerful" players and adversaries as to become almost unbelievable. Anyway, this is what she said to me: Our payment is imminent. The delay has been due to a continuing and endless series of administrative measures that must be approved world-wide, which makes the identification of an exact payment date uncertain. So, when Bob Hollenegg writes that payment could occur at any time, he is speaking the truth. There are two "Paymasters" that will receive these funds: Cottrell and Tyler, TX. When the payments are announced to the Paymasters, Al Hodges will issue and official statement to all shareholders explaining the details, such as how much, when, and in what manner we will be paid. Payments will be made in several, separate cycles. The first payment we receive will represent $.80 (eighty cents) per share. It is for the delay of payment, which should have been made to us in 2007. The other payments(s) will occur about one month thereafter. The exact amount(s) of these subsequent payment(s) is unknown at this time (or was not conveyed by Mr. Hodges), but is being circulated on the boards in the area of $5 to $6 per share. In response to my inquiry as to how we could get such a huge payout, my friend said that she too was astonished when she heard Al Hodges describe this. However, she very much trusts and believes in her close friend (Mr. Hodges) and has no reason to doubt his word. That's it from me. Everyone can now draw their own conclusions in this matter. Merry Christmas to all. This is all the news I have to share at this time. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- removed PS. as Sir Charles brought this to my attention: You might want to remove the PS part as it is not part of the original text. It comes from a poster who failed to read the original text correctly. He assumes Al was in the conversation but the message clearly states it is between the source and an Italian friend of Al. |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 10, 2018 15:11:35 GMT -6
:)any idea of timeline? jim/SR I don't know. We hear dates that come and go... Who knows anything for sure?? |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 10, 2018 19:56:11 GMT -6
Ok... not that I believe her... But interesting...
Posting the bad with the good.
But Ex SEC Attorney Hakala told a shareholder in a lengthy phone call the last week of December that there is no money for shareholders ...it was all a scam.
Hopefully that was what she thought when she was involved??
Who knows??
|
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 14, 2018 18:38:12 GMT -6
Yes. $0.23/sh initial payment only for Fines and Penalties. Plus more to come later! - sammy Fines & Penalties is MORE THAN $.23 cents/sh $.23 cents is first small payment before F&P Lets just receive Notification and enjoy from there Harv Harv if .23 cents is going to be first payment for f&p how many payments are we looking at? F&P would be one payment lump sum which all would have to sign an NDA before receiving the funds(small payment first $.23 cents per share with NDA attached), breach the NDA requirements loose your settlement funds. Trust Fund to follow or could be all in one lump sum with two different Categories, F&P Tax Free, Trust Fund Tax Free. Harv 🤞 |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 19, 2018 8:59:06 GMT -6
A status hearing is scheduled before Judge Jennifer Dorsey for January 19, 2018, 09:00 AM at LV Courtroom 6D, Lloyd D. George U.S. Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, NV 89101 for defendant(s) John M. Edwards, Brian Dvorak, Ginger Gutierrez, James Kinney. The purpose of this hearing is to determine if there are issues that the Court needs to address and to schedule any necessary future court dates. A status hearing is scheduled before Judge Jennifer Dorsey for March 19, 2018, 01:30 PM at LV Courtroom 6D, Lloyd D. George U.S. Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, NV 89101 for defendant(s) John M. Edwards, Brian Dvorak, Ginger Gutierrez, James Kinney. The purpose of this hearing is to determine if there are issues that the Court needs to address and to schedule any necessary future court dates. Read more: millionaires.proboards.com/thread/50271/october-25-2017-department-justice?page=4#ixzz54dpYr100 |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 19, 2018 9:00:40 GMT -6
"But remember SK has changed his story to say harmed (corrected) shareholders will get something that the SEC is separating harmed from non-harmed....whatever that really entails...differing stories about that." The only thing SK can do is sign off on the transfer of certificates and run his NHI shell of a company. What Robert Maheu setup for the bonafide shareholders, and passed on the baton to Mr. Hodges, SK cannot change anything that has already been established for the bonafide shareholders. The ONLY STORY bonafide shareholders of CMKX need to follow is Mr. Hodges, and no other narrative. Its really that simple! Was SK even a shareholder when there was a Cert Pull in the first place? Harv |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 19, 2018 15:38:11 GMT -6
Hello everyone, the hearing was very short. Bottom line, the trial has been postponed until mid June and the next status hearing will be on 4/9. Everything seemed very routine, FWIW. |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 25, 2018 2:21:29 GMT -6
Strange!! What is this??  On Bloomberg www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=3724479 news on cmkm Carolyn Casavant January 25, 2018 3:21 AM ETMetals and Mining Company Overview of CMKM Diamonds Inc. Key Executives For CMKM Diamonds Inc. Mr. James E. Lowden Interim Chief Executive Officer Mrs. Carolyn Casavant Executive Vice President and Director Compensation as of Fiscal Year 2017. May be old. But why current dates?? Click on 'people' Thanks for the link psychicballs! |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 25, 2018 14:42:57 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 25, 2018 17:14:13 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Jan 27, 2018 19:11:38 GMT -6
From 2015...snifferpup Mod Squad ***** Le Pup~  Member since: September 2006 Posts: 21,683 Member is Online Donald Stoecklein in Trouble with SEC May 15, 2015 at 12:13am Westlin used to be Jarvis Entertainment Group, Inc.............Changed to Westlin Corporation in 2003 and went underground in a fallout shelter.......................Funny as it was back then, it makes sense now, although they are I believe closed~ From 2006 by Franko....Franko10 ™ DESIGNER ***** Member since: November 2007 Posts: 1,524 I got the connection to China Marketing Media Mar 22, 2006 at 2:05pm QuoteEditlikePost Options Post by Franko10 ™ on Mar 22, 2006 at 2:05pm I got the connection to China Marketing Media,.. finally,. lol Okay so I started out finding where the companies come from and who is on them,.. when I found the name PETER ROSPOND on CHINA MARKETING MEDIA, INC. filings,.. when I searched him out I found that he used to be attached to Westlin Corporation,.. Which those of us who have DD’d the old players knows that is the Name For Jarvis Entertainment,.. Why is that important,.. well that is who Urban Bought the CMKI from to begin with. Interesting huh,.. now it gets better,… China Marketing Media bought and switched from Info Life,.. On Nov. 17, the company announced it was changing its name to Westlin Corp. The company's new plan is to focus on data services in its 70-foot-deep bomb shelter, which was built during the early 1980s by a relative of former Taiwanese President Chiang Kai-Shek. Peter Rospond, formerly the company's network administrator, took over as CEO in September. Rospond, who has been with the company for five years, has also held the position of CEO at InfoLife, an Internet service provider. So is this the mysterious connection Jay Adobe alluded to all along or is it merely a coincidence they match up? I doubt it in CMKM there is no such thing,. lol GLTA,.. I think this Jay may have it nailed,.. JMHO |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 3, 2018 16:33:07 GMT -6
I have talked to a shareholder who confirmed the information written about Gates is correct. He confirmed the brokers settled. But Gates did not guarantee we would be paid. So it is time for Gates to step up to the plate with what he has as I was also someone who paid him for the information. As long as this has taken and my shareholders friends die with this dream then the dreamers in CMKX have been fooled. From millionaires.proboards.com/thread/50427/fact |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 7, 2018 1:03:09 GMT -6
You guys are funny. I told the reason for delay, many times . Waiting for case to be over. Then cancellation of around 100 billion shares held by culprits. Then release of money. (If it is still available). You may also contact Seahawkswc on Ihub and ask for delay. I don't know him personally. Oldepro knows that I am in touch with Mr Gates. With respect. PS there is more to this saga. Clarification 'Possible release of money' , did not come from Mr Gates. It was from another source , and information came few years back. I don't know, if money is still available or not. Amt told was between $1.20 and $2.40 , plus interest. Nothing more to add. With respect Guys pay attention. Pootsa just confirmed , what I was told way back. SOME SHARES WILL BE CANCELLED AFTER THE TRIAL IS OVER. Please refer my earlier posts. (Hence delay in payment. Payment only after cancellation of shares.) With respect |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 7, 2018 1:06:58 GMT -6
A general response regarding the rumor that Phx Gold or anyone else for that matter “caught” Ameritrade. I know just a little bit about market makers and the rules. It was common practice for all brokers to sell share markers to their clients, and I can tell you,at that time I owned a nice percentage of those shares. The brokers were allowed to pool these markers for a specified time period. When it was required through CEDE they would have to purchase those shares from the market place. In this case Ameritrade bought from a broker that was pushing boatloads on the market,Nevwest. They do not care where these shares come from,as long as they are cleared through the seller, a fellow broker and CEDE. That cert remained in street name,aka Ameritrade for their clients who had markers in their accounts. People call this selling short,but it’s not. They didn’t sell shares in hopes the security would go under,they wouldn’t jeopardize their billion dollar business for the amount of shares sold at the price of the security at that time. I know factually that some of my shares (markers) were included in the covered shares. You can call it naked shorting if you want,but the broker in question committed no crime and was never given any punishments. They carried the security to closing, the closing that is afforded brokers amongst themselves. Regardless of numbers matching, which was merely Ameritrade putting out to market that specific number of shares they needed, and a Nevwest client selling that exact number to fulfill the request. There is no proof at all with regards to selling short and no reason for that particular broker to gamble on this or any other fractional or sub,sub,sub penny stock. The remedy for not covering within the proper time period Is certainly not mega billions of dollars. Too often today, as we see everyday in juror decisions, there is no longer a beyond reasonable doubt thought process. There is though, a rush to judgement based upon the wildest of circumstantial evidence. Which is the case here. Having said the above, there is more to this than meets the eyes. There has been for some while a need to cancel shares sold from Helen Bagley and friends firms. If these shares are shares sold to Ameritrade or any other broker late to the table, shares from Deli dog, and a whole plethora of unknowing individuals then Ameritrade is on the hook to make the Shareholders whole,which would be to pay either the price of the security at SHs purchase point or to pay the higher amount of the share price going forward. In this situation the security never appreciated but went under. The end of trial should bring forward a cancellation of shares. The unknowing purchasers included a lot of decent people. I believe Hodges purchased some of these shares as well. I also believe there has been a battle going on behind the scenes to get these shares included in any making whole of the shareholder base. But what do I know? I don’t have a source,it’s circumstantial. |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 7, 2018 17:26:42 GMT -6
A general response regarding the rumor that pootsa knows what he/she is talking about. Well there you go… pootsa explains everything! I guess we should all just ignore stuff like this… When questioned by Leslie A Hakala and Marshall S Sprung (SEC enforcement attorney's) during his deposition (File No. LA-03028-A) at the Securities and Exchange Commission, Pacific Region office in Los Angeles, California on Tuesday January 24, 2006 with regards to what evidence he was shown that led him to believe that there was a naked short in CMKM Diamonds Attorney Donald J. Stoecklein stated that there was an expert brought in from Oregon and that after his analysis his position was that there was a 14 to 1 short position in this stock, meaning that for every 1 legal share issued there were 13 others that were not! When questioned... why did he believe this person? Mr. Stoecklein stated... “The man is very credible. He spent 25 years chasing shorts. He is an expert assisting a law firm down in Texas right now on a short position, and some major litigation. So why would I believe KPMG that their audit is good? They’re an expert in what they do. It’s the same issue to me.”
That’s only about 9 trillion naked shorted, sorry, I mean counterfeit shares that magically appeared out of thin air… nothing to be concerned about there, obviously that expert with 25 years experience from KPMG, only one of the largest auditors on the planet, was high on drugs at the time and all of those counterfeit shares were imaginary! And this is of no concern… The “Jefferies Letter”… this letter, dated May 6th 2005, is the response from Cathleen Shine, Deputy General Counsel for the securities clearing house Jefferies & Company, to a request from Ms. Anne Dansard Glowacki of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD, now FINRA) concerning Jefferies’ failure to report certain trades in CMKM Diamonds in March of 2004. In it, it explains, how they (Jefferies) cleared trades for 2 of their customers totaling nearly 112 billion shares of CMKM Diamonds “Ex-Clearing” and now needed guidance from the NASD on how to remedy the situation. “Ex-Clearing” refers to trades that are cleared outside of a clearing house and are therefore not reported to the public and the market in general. On the same day copies of the letter were forwarded to counsel for CMKM Diamonds and to the SEC who (mistakenly?) provided it as evidence during the CMKM Diamonds administrative hearing... during this hearing SEC attorney Gregory Glynn asked to withdraw it as evidence, Attorney Frizzell objected because it was provided as evidence by the SEC in the first place, Judge Murray sided with Frizzell and ruled it to stay in evidence.
That letter clearly illustrates how billions and even trillions of shares could enter the market unreported… clearly no broker dealers or market makers or regulators involved there! And don’t pay any attention to this document previously available on our website… View Attachment (For clarity the green and yellow highlights and the text at the very bottom were added by the author) Like it says there on the bottom… subtract 703,518,875,000 legal outstanding shares from the 2,581,027,515,064 issued shares and you end up with 1,877,508,640,064 that don’t belong, and that’s only from 3063 of the approximately 50,000 shareholders accounts… do the math! So, please, do not pay any attention to any of the above obviously fabricated evidence… you may just grasp the concept that although Ameritrade may have been innocent (doubtful in my opinion) in the naked shorting, sorry, counterfeiting of CMKM Diamonds there were approximately 100(?) other broker dealers, market makers and clearing houses along with a corrupt SEC and DOJ that were not! That being said pootsa does make some interesting statements… “I know just a little bit about market makers and the rules.” Unfortunately all of those involved didn't follow the rules now did they! “They do not care where these shares come from,as long as they are cleared through the seller, a fellow broker and CEDE” That is correct, unfortunately “THEY” were mostly corrupt so none of them cared were the counterfeit shares came from to settle their books! It’s not like they were going to report each other, remember, they didn't follow the rules! “but the broker in question committed no crime and was never given any punishments.” Oh, and the SEC, DOJ and the FBI are by far the most honest, trustworthy and dedicated to law enforcement organizations in the US Justice System! Hello, follow the news much? “There is no proof at all with regards to selling short” And no one would care if they were just selling short… that’s legal! It’s the naked shorting, sorry, I mean counterfeiting of our stock that we’re concerned with! For proof of that please see above! “Is certainly not mega billions of dollars.” Well without getting into fines, penalties, punitive damages and or possibly RICO charges that could possibly make the original fines, penalties, punitive damages even larger… just covering the possibly 10 trillion naked shorted, sorry, I mean counterfeit shares @ $0.0005 equals $5 billion! MEGA is a certainty! “There is though, a rush to judgement based upon the wildest of circumstantial evidence. Which is the case here.” Seriously, this has been going on for over a decade and if the evidence was only circumstantial this would have been over a decade ago! “Having said the above, there is more to this than meets the eyes.” No sheet Sherlock! Just like we've been saying for years! What’s confusing is… if this stock is worthless and was nothing but a giant scam on the part of the company… so basically it’s been finished since the day of revocation back in 2005, over 12 years ago… and there is no settlement for the shareholders… why are there still so many bashers concerned about the wellbeing of the CMKM Diamonds shareholders that they feel the need to constantly explain how badly we were had? To all you bashers… thank you so much for sticking around all of these years confirming that “there is more to this than meets the eyes” and for that sentiment of wellbeing… it’s much appreciated, but not needed, it’s not us that will be going to JAIL!!! “In this situation the security never appreciated but went under.” ACTUALLY IT WAS NAKED SHORTED INTO OBLIVION! That’s enough critiquing of pootsa’s comments; I think we can all agree that this person has zero credibility! You all have a nice day! Uncle Jed 🌟I think both have credibility!🌟 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 14, 2018 21:48:36 GMT -6
I just received this update after contacting the DOJ on their web site yesterday... My name is Trisha and I work for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Nevada. Thanks for checking with us. The trial is currently set for March 27, 2018, in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas, Nevada. If you are a victim, you may contact the Victim Witness Coordinator for the U.S. Attorney's Office at USANV.VWC@usdoj.gov or at (702) 388-6336. Trisha Young Department of Justice U.S. Attorney's Office District of Nevada (702) 388-6336 |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 20, 2018 12:11:16 GMT -6
Hello everyone, the hearing was very short. Bottom line, the trial has been postponed until mid June and the next status hearing will be on 4/9. Everything seemed very routine, FWIW. Did they give an explanation? Scheduling conflicts and a possible need to reassess John Edwards' competency. Who had the conflict? Thanks for being there vegashousehunter.  sogwap The conflict was with more than one attorney on both sides. You are all welcome. And now you know. Yet, I assume the DOJ will issue an update in the coming days. pr (Thanks to vegashousehunter for providing the update!) |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 22, 2018 10:08:21 GMT -6
🌟alch11 is Attorney Al Hodges 🌟 Based upon what I am told, payment is imminent! 😃🤗 |
|
|
|
Post by oreocookie on Feb 22, 2018 10:57:32 GMT -6
The world is about to become a much better place........it’s just gonna be a little painful along the way, depending on ones perspective! It’s all good!
Boyscout
|
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 23, 2018 13:19:54 GMT -6
Has anyone been able to verify that Al Hodges actually sent that message? Yes It is from his account on Tramp's board. Alch11= Attorney Al Clifton Hodges |
|
|
|
Post by seagull on Feb 23, 2018 13:20:25 GMT -6
🌟From Attorney Al Hodges🌟 ... on Tramp's board... For those who always insist on more: The word ‘imminent’ was used in its common context and meaning, to wit: imminent • Synonyms • Examples • Word Origin See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com adjective 1. likely to occur at any moment; impending: Her death is imminent. 2. projecting or leaning forward; overhanging. Origin of imminent Latin 1520-1530 1520-30; < Latin imminent- (stem of imminēns), present participle of imminēre to overhang, equivalent to im- im-1 + -min- from a base meaning “jut out, project, rise” (cf. eminent, mount2) + -ent- -ent Related forms imminently, adverb imminentness, noun unimminent, adjective Can be confused eminent, immanent, imminent. imminent star see definition of imminent show • adj at hand, on the way forthcoming Relevance A-Z Complexity Length • lists • blocks Common Informal Synonyms for imminent adj at hand, on the way • forthcomingstar • immediatestar • impendingstar • inevitablestar • likelystar • loomingstar • possiblestar • probablestar • unavoidablestar • about to happenstar • approachingstar • brewingstar • closestar • comingstar • expectantstar • fast-approachingstar • followingstar • gatheringstar • handwriting-on-the-wallstar • in storestar • in the airstar o in the cardsstar • in the offingstar • in the windstar • in viewstar • ineluctablestar • inescapablestar • inevasiblestar • menacingstar • nearstar • nearingstar • nextstar o nighstar • on its waystar • on the horizonstar • on the vergestar • overhangingstar • see it comingstar • threateningstar • to comestar • unescapablestar Explore Dictionary.com Insults We Should Bring Back 20 Words That Will Show Your Age Avoid these words. Seriously. The Oldest Words in English Antonyms for imminent • avoidable • distant • escapable • later • never • unlikely • doubtful • far • future Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus, Third Edition Copyright © 2013 by the Philip Lief Group. Cite This Source Extra Cozy Words We Need Right Now More words related to imminent close adj. near, nearby • abutting • across the street • adjacent • adjoining • approaching • around the corner • at hand • contiguous • convenient • give or take a little • handy • hard by • immediate • imminent • impending • in spitting distance • in the ball park • near-at-hand • nearest • nearly • neighboring • next • nigh • proximate • under one's nose • warm coming adj. approaching, promising • about to happen • advancing • almost on one • anticipated • aspiring • at hand • certain • close • converging • deserving • docking • drawing near • due • en route • eventual • expected • fated • foreseen • forthcoming • future • gaining upon • getting near • immediate • imminent • impending • in prospect • in store • in the offing • in the wind • in view • instant • marked • near • nearing • next • nigh • oncoming • ordained • predestined • preparing • progressing • prospective • pursuing • running after • subsequent • to be • up-and-coming fated adj. governed by fate • decided by fate • destined • doomed • foreordained • imminent • impending • in the stars • inescapable • inevitable • predestined • predetermined • prejudged • preordained • unavoidable future adj. to come; expected • approaching • booked • budgeted • close at hand • coming • coming up • destined • down the line • down the pike • down the road • eventual • fated • final • forthcoming • from here in • from here on • from here to eternity • from now on in • imminent • impending • in the cards • in the course of time • in the offing • inevitable • just around the corner • later • likely • looked toward • near • next • planned • prospective • scheduled • subsequent • to be • ulterior • ultimate • unborn • unfolding • up impending adj. forthcoming • approaching • at hand • brewing • coming • gathering • handwriting-on-the-wall • hovering • imminent • in the cards • in the offing • in the wind • looking to • looming • menacing • near • nearing • ominous • on the horizon • overhanging • portending • proximate • see it coming • threatening • waiting to inevitable adj. certain; cannot be avoided • all locked up • assured • binding • compulsory • decided • decreed • destined • determined • doomed • fated • fateful • fixed • for certain • foreordained • imminent • impending • in the bag • ineluctable • ineludible • inescapable • inexorable • inflexible • irresistible • irrevocable • necessary • no ifs ands or buts • obligatory • ordained • pat • prescribed • settled • sure • unalterable • unavoidable • undeniable • unpreventable • without recourse Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus, Third Edition Copyright © 2013 by the Philip Lief Group. Cite This Source 1 2 3 NEXT Word Origin & History imminent 1528, from L. imminentem (nom. imminens), prp. of imminere "to overhang, impend, be near," from in- "into" + minere "jut out," related to mons "hill" (see mount). Home British & World English imminent Definition of imminent in English: • • • • imminent adjective • 1About to happen. ‘they were in imminent danger of being swept away’ • • 2archaic Overhanging. Origin Late Middle English: from Latin imminent- ‘overhanging, impending’, from the verb imminere, from in- ‘upon, towards’ + minere ‘to project’. Hope this helps! A.Clifton Hodges (CSBN 046803) HODGES AND ASSOCIATES, PLC P. O. Box 12070 Reno, Nevada 89510 TEL: (818) 625-6222 E-Mail: al@hodgesandassociates.com |
|
