Post by Twist Capper on Jan 31, 2012 9:00:19 GMT -6
Ty single
ty.... taskforceviking
Phone Call to Steve Kirkpatrick -- Interesting...« Thread Started Yesterday at 11:57pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By: king1000
30 Jan 2012, 10:40 PM CST
Rating: post rating 2 Rate this post: Msg. 1065388 of 1065397
Falcyou see if these work for the update
www.filedropper.com/shareholderkirkpatrickphonecall1
www.filedropper.com/shareholderkirkpatrickphonecall2
Some recaps & Opinions..........
dizardos
Re: Phone Call to Steve Kirkpatrick -- Interesting
« Reply #6 Today at 1:30am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To those who wonder whether it is good, I would say: Do you like theater?
If so, go ahead and listen.
Mathematically what takes place could be construed as the following:
If Hodges' operation is X, then Kirkpatrick's operation is X-1
In concrete words:
1) The company has no money.
2) Work is being undertaken in regards the lawsuit against Wells Fargo and the repatriation of money from Urban Casavant and John Edwards.
3) The only overhead costs consists of Transfer Online fees.
4) Two million dollars is required for the deal with Emerson Koch.
5) There will be no shareholder meeting for the moment.
Now let's get to real theater elements:
6) Steve Kirkpatrick is not getting paid for his services. Kirkpatrick pays expenses out of his own pocket. As a matter of fact Kirkpatrick only became a shareholder in 2010 with a total amount of two million shares. At that time he did not even know the ticker symbol as someone else completed the share transaction for Kirkpatrick, but Kirkpatrick did pay for the shares himself.
My personal translation (no offense intended, but relatively speaking it remains true): Someone who receives nothing, knows nothing and has practically nothing (in the sense of interest) is now running the company. Why would anyone do that? Kirkpatrick makes it sound as if there is very little and yet he hangs around as if he would have nothing better to do. Of course....it would not be the first time that knowledgeable individuals appear to 'become less bright' once they join the company.
7) The suggestion was made to go back to trading. The reason was given that the naked short could then be covered. This would increase shareholder value or at least.....that is this theory.
And.....
remoaz
Re: Phone Call to Steve Kirkpatrick -- Interesting
« Reply #9 Today at 5:14am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what I got out of it:
SK (Steve Kirkpatrick) is going to meet with a law firm in Texas in the near future (he said he's going to Texas when his daughter has her baby). This law firm specializes in naked short cases. They are considering taking the case on contingency. This is the only way that case will go forward at this time.
The next piece of property they sell will get the company out of debt. It sounded like (and my math may be off here) they have two they need to sell, one they are close to acquiring and several more around the world they will pursue.
They will take the Wells Fargo case "all the way to the Supreme Court" if needed. I don't remember him giving any indication of where that stands right now.
Frizzell is no longer general counsel. He is only working on pursuing assets. SK is going to hire another lawyer to be general counsel.
Jerry referred to the posters on the Fish and Chirps board a few times but it seemed to me SK had no idea what he was talking about.
Jerry said Hodges sold 6 million shares to someone for $50k. I hadn't heard that before (and SK didn't confirm or deny).
SK doesn't think Hodges has anything but he believes Hodges really does believe he has a case. He also said several times he hopes and prays Hodges is successful even though he doesn't believe there is any hope in what he's doing. He said Hodges put everything he has into this.
SK said we are almost a year behind paying the transfer agent. The cost is $2k per month and they were being patient.
SK is meeting with Koch in March I think he said to talk about the 1010 agreement which calls for a payment of $2mil before the core samples can be tested. It sounded like he is going to try and re-negotiate that agreement but that is just my opinion about what he said.
He said a bunch of times Jerry would be allowed to see anything he is entitled to see by law. Jerry asked about the "70 boxes in Las Vegas" but it didn't sound like SK knew much about them.
Jerry asked for a meeting and vote but it doesn't sound like either will happen any time soon.
Jerry suggested they sell more shares to raise capital to test the core samples. He thinks shareholders would invest more money if the company was transparent.
SK said that if they can get some capital they can go back to trading which would force a short cover if there is a short. He stated they want to go back to trading multiple times.
SK said he believed Frizzell, West, Lowden, Hodges and Koch are all honourable men.
If you listen to it, be patient. Jerry cuts SK off continually for the first 3/4 of the conversation. He does finally let him talk and say everything he kept trying to say.
That's as much of the important stuff I remember. I apologize if I got anything wrong but it should be pretty close.
ty.... taskforceviking
Phone Call to Steve Kirkpatrick -- Interesting...« Thread Started Yesterday at 11:57pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By: king1000
30 Jan 2012, 10:40 PM CST
Rating: post rating 2 Rate this post: Msg. 1065388 of 1065397
Falcyou see if these work for the update
www.filedropper.com/shareholderkirkpatrickphonecall1
www.filedropper.com/shareholderkirkpatrickphonecall2
Some recaps & Opinions..........
dizardos
Re: Phone Call to Steve Kirkpatrick -- Interesting
« Reply #6 Today at 1:30am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To those who wonder whether it is good, I would say: Do you like theater?
If so, go ahead and listen.
Mathematically what takes place could be construed as the following:
If Hodges' operation is X, then Kirkpatrick's operation is X-1
In concrete words:
1) The company has no money.
2) Work is being undertaken in regards the lawsuit against Wells Fargo and the repatriation of money from Urban Casavant and John Edwards.
3) The only overhead costs consists of Transfer Online fees.
4) Two million dollars is required for the deal with Emerson Koch.
5) There will be no shareholder meeting for the moment.
Now let's get to real theater elements:
6) Steve Kirkpatrick is not getting paid for his services. Kirkpatrick pays expenses out of his own pocket. As a matter of fact Kirkpatrick only became a shareholder in 2010 with a total amount of two million shares. At that time he did not even know the ticker symbol as someone else completed the share transaction for Kirkpatrick, but Kirkpatrick did pay for the shares himself.
My personal translation (no offense intended, but relatively speaking it remains true): Someone who receives nothing, knows nothing and has practically nothing (in the sense of interest) is now running the company. Why would anyone do that? Kirkpatrick makes it sound as if there is very little and yet he hangs around as if he would have nothing better to do. Of course....it would not be the first time that knowledgeable individuals appear to 'become less bright' once they join the company.
7) The suggestion was made to go back to trading. The reason was given that the naked short could then be covered. This would increase shareholder value or at least.....that is this theory.
And.....
remoaz
Re: Phone Call to Steve Kirkpatrick -- Interesting
« Reply #9 Today at 5:14am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what I got out of it:
SK (Steve Kirkpatrick) is going to meet with a law firm in Texas in the near future (he said he's going to Texas when his daughter has her baby). This law firm specializes in naked short cases. They are considering taking the case on contingency. This is the only way that case will go forward at this time.
The next piece of property they sell will get the company out of debt. It sounded like (and my math may be off here) they have two they need to sell, one they are close to acquiring and several more around the world they will pursue.
They will take the Wells Fargo case "all the way to the Supreme Court" if needed. I don't remember him giving any indication of where that stands right now.
Frizzell is no longer general counsel. He is only working on pursuing assets. SK is going to hire another lawyer to be general counsel.
Jerry referred to the posters on the Fish and Chirps board a few times but it seemed to me SK had no idea what he was talking about.
Jerry said Hodges sold 6 million shares to someone for $50k. I hadn't heard that before (and SK didn't confirm or deny).
SK doesn't think Hodges has anything but he believes Hodges really does believe he has a case. He also said several times he hopes and prays Hodges is successful even though he doesn't believe there is any hope in what he's doing. He said Hodges put everything he has into this.
SK said we are almost a year behind paying the transfer agent. The cost is $2k per month and they were being patient.
SK is meeting with Koch in March I think he said to talk about the 1010 agreement which calls for a payment of $2mil before the core samples can be tested. It sounded like he is going to try and re-negotiate that agreement but that is just my opinion about what he said.
He said a bunch of times Jerry would be allowed to see anything he is entitled to see by law. Jerry asked about the "70 boxes in Las Vegas" but it didn't sound like SK knew much about them.
Jerry asked for a meeting and vote but it doesn't sound like either will happen any time soon.
Jerry suggested they sell more shares to raise capital to test the core samples. He thinks shareholders would invest more money if the company was transparent.
SK said that if they can get some capital they can go back to trading which would force a short cover if there is a short. He stated they want to go back to trading multiple times.
SK said he believed Frizzell, West, Lowden, Hodges and Koch are all honourable men.
If you listen to it, be patient. Jerry cuts SK off continually for the first 3/4 of the conversation. He does finally let him talk and say everything he kept trying to say.
That's as much of the important stuff I remember. I apologize if I got anything wrong but it should be pretty close.