|
|
Post by portrush on Sept 2, 2008 13:55:13 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by portrush on Sept 2, 2008 14:00:58 GMT -6
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 58449 / September 2, 2008
Admin. Proc. File No. 3-13156
PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST DARYL ANDERSON
On September 2, 2008, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) issued an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Notice of Hearing (Order) against Daryl Anderson (Anderson) of Las Vegas, Nevada, based on the entry of a permanent injunction against Anderson in the civil action entitled SEC v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 02:08-cv-00437-LRH-RJJ in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.
In the Order, the Division of Enforcement alleges that on August 8, 2008, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada entered a Judgment of Permanent Injunction by consent against Anderson, permanently enjoining him from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933.
The Division of Enforcement further alleges in the Order that the Commission’s complaint in the civil action alleges that, among other things, from March 2003 until May 2005, Anderson improperly sold more than 259 billion shares of unregistered securities of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in 569 separate transactions, which generated more than $53.3 million in proceeds and yielded approximately $2.3 million in commissions for Anderson.
A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to determine whether the allegations contained in the Order are true, to provide Anderson an opportunity to dispute the allegations, and to determine what, if any, remedial action is appropriate and in the public interest, pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Order requires the Administrative Law Judge to issue an initial decision no later than 120 days from the date of service of the Order, pursuant to Rule 360(a)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2008 14:02:40 GMT -6
Well, that puts us out another six months, which in turn follows that if they follow the discovery schedule published in June, it will take at least until June 2009.
Might as well concentrate on living life until then, for there will be nothing but failed rumors and acrimony towards those who bring them and those who dispute the rumors until then.
Have a nice winter, folks.
|
|
|
|
Post by portrush on Sept 2, 2008 14:11:01 GMT -6
Well, it does say "no later than 120 days" which for some of the other culprits, it did happen much faster, so I guess we won't know until it happens. pr  |
|
|
|
Post by skibuff on Sept 3, 2008 0:45:39 GMT -6
those azzes keep dragging there feet just to string this out forever so they don't have to pay out any money!
|
|
|
|
Post by skibuff on Sept 3, 2008 0:48:09 GMT -6
when it comes time to vote see if any senators in your state sit on the banking ,houseing committee and if they do get rid of them!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2008 5:41:14 GMT -6
i second that motion ,... skiff god bless all bonafides . now please god . twt.
|
|
