|
|
Post by diamondjewels on Nov 29, 2005 8:03:58 GMT -6
knobias.10kwizard.com/filing.php?repo=tenk&ipage=3809567&doc=1&total=&back=2&g=&attach=onI am editing this to add the CMKX mention: In early 2004, Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKX) drilled a known, small kimberlite body (the “Smeaton Kimberlite”) located approximately 10 kilometres north of the northwestern end of the main FalC kimberlite trend. Their drillhole encountered kimberlite, but the extent of sampling currently is unknown. Historically, the Smeaton Kimberlite has been penetrated during at least three other drilling programs by junior exploration companies including Shane Resources Ltd. Meager recovery of microdiamonds has previously been reported, but no effort has been made to substantially sample the kimberlite. In 2004, Casavant drilled coreholes located northeast of kilometre 54 of the Division Road in the FalC Forest Reserve based on airborne geophysical anomalies and did not intersect kimberlite.
|
|
|
|
Post by jwlob on Nov 29, 2005 8:11:17 GMT -6
That's how you file reports  |
|
|
|
Post by audreyhepburn on Nov 29, 2005 8:12:55 GMT -6
Now if we could only get a report like that!
Couple interesting things I noticed.
1. The length of time to issue the status of core samples.
2. If there are so many macro diamonds (49%) of kimberlites and we are anywhere CLOSe to the region WE HAVE TO HAVE DIAMONDS.
JMO
Audrey
|
|
|
|
Post by morris08 on Nov 29, 2005 8:19:20 GMT -6
audrey, in regards to your #2...
I had to laugh at George Burns rebuttal to that statement: "If I hang out with the whole Swedish Bikini team does that make me a hot blonde?" LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by rocket147 on Nov 29, 2005 8:29:32 GMT -6
audrey, in regards to your #2... I had to laugh at George Burns rebuttal to that statement: "If I hang out with the whole Swedish Bikini team does that make me a hot blonde?" LOL GB's example is inaccurate...... One drills a core sample and extrapolates what the core sample data shows, to indicate what might be near by. So if we are close to shore's data wouldn't we have as good a diamond find as Shore? Rocket |
|
|
|
Post by sidekick on Nov 29, 2005 8:41:16 GMT -6
audrey, in regards to your #2... I had to laugh at George Burns rebuttal to that statement: "If I hang out with the whole Swedish Bikini team does that make me a hot blonde?" LOL GB's example is inaccurate...... One drills a core sample and extrapolates what the core sample data shows, to indicate what might be near by. So if we are close to shore's data wouldn't we have as good a diamond find as Shore? Rocket I would think so... Now that is the proper thought process for this observation imo. |
|
|
|
Post by stockcrazy on Nov 29, 2005 9:11:01 GMT -6
and here we are mentioned
In early 2004, Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKX) drilled a known, small kimberlite body (the “Smeaton Kimberlite”) located approximately 10 kilometres north of the northwestern end of the main FalC kimberlite trend. Their drillhole encountered kimberlite, but the extent of sampling currently is unknown. Historically, the Smeaton Kimberlite has been penetrated during at least three other drilling programs by junior exploration companies including Shane Resources Ltd. Meager recovery of microdiamonds has previously been reported, but no effort has been made to substantially sample the kimberlite. In 2004, Casavant drilled coreholes located northeast of kilometre 54 of the Division Road in the FalC Forest Reserve based on airborne geophysical anomalies and did not intersect kimberlite.
25
|
|
|
|
Post by oldman on Nov 29, 2005 9:16:46 GMT -6
and here we are mentioned In early 2004, Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKX) drilled a known, small kimberlite body (the “Smeaton Kimberlite”) located approximately 10 kilometres north of the northwestern end of the main FalC kimberlite trend. Their drillhole encountered kimberlite, but the extent of sampling currently is unknown. Historically, the Smeaton Kimberlite has been penetrated during at least three other drilling programs by junior exploration companies including Shane Resources Ltd. Meager recovery of microdiamonds has previously been reported, but no effort has been made to substantially sample the kimberlite. In 2004, Casavant drilled coreholes located northeast of kilometre 54 of the Division Road in the FalC Forest Reserve based on airborne geophysical anomalies and did not intersect kimberlite. 25 Again aiming a little on the positive .... How would they know unless we're working together? |
|
|
|
Post by stockcrazy on Nov 29, 2005 9:18:48 GMT -6
Kind of my thoughts but not really sure.
But also why would they want to mention the little revoked delisted scam company that some have indicated we are or were??
makes you wonder
|
|
|
|
Post by chicad1966 on Nov 29, 2005 9:31:15 GMT -6
DJ Wasn't the wording used somewhere in one of our updates or the last pr, that said we were calling our project the "fort a la corne project" This wording is close or the same, I don't remember which. Do you have a link for the old pr anywhere to compare? The wording of this is interesting to me!!!! Chicad Technical Report For the Fort à la Corne Diamond Project — November 09, 2005 Consideration of the longer term view for the Fort á la Corne Project has provided the Joint Venture Partners with a clear perspective on the way forward. Predicted supply, demand, and price trends for rough diamonds into the next decade provide a rationale for accelerating the present rate of work on the project in order to be well positioned with respect to the favourable forecasts. In late 2004, an overview perspective of the Fort á la Corne Project, from present day to an assumed eventual mining operation, was examined and a time-line developed. The current phase of the project was denoted as the Advanced Exploration and Evaluation Study (AE&E) and was estimated to require three years in order to complete. The overall time-line for the Fort á la Corne Project is considered to be aggressive, being driven by the need to favourably position the commencement of mining operations in relation to the long term rough diamond supply and demand predictions. A 2005 budget of CDN$25.6M applies to the period from 22 February 2005 to 15 December 2005. Results from the historical programs have shown that the Fort à la Corne kimberlites contain higher-grade zones. As such, it is possible that higher-grade units from a number of kimberlites, when considered collectively, may form a resource which can be profitably mined. At present, some 35 million carats distributed over 369 million tonnes and three different kimberlites have been identified at a deposit level of confidence. The project strategy has now been revised to focus on the higher-grade units within proximally-located priority kimberlite bodies and to consider them in combination. This approach has the advantage of considerably increasing the size of the potential resource and may permit significant economy of scale to be achieved for a large scale mining operation. |
|
|
|
Post by gluggo on Nov 29, 2005 10:41:56 GMT -6
This same article was mentioned in Shore Golds earlier 6K about 2 weeks ago. While there is no real great diamond find in the results it does make you wonder if we are partners with Shore Gold since this is now their 2nd 6K with CMKX and our JV's mentioned! |
|
|
|
Post by svtcobra on Nov 29, 2005 11:05:10 GMT -6
well at least it showed we drilled in another spot other than carolyn
|
|
|
|
Post by urbanswarrior on Nov 29, 2005 11:31:36 GMT -6
Well Well Well...Isnt this something!!...
Their drillhole encountered kimberlite, but the extent of sampling currently is unknown.
Currently..
Can you say LOCKED in a warehouse hmmmmmmmmmm
|
|
|
|
Post by cashcowmoo on Nov 29, 2005 11:42:37 GMT -6
this is gREAT news! YAY!
|
|
|
|
Post by tramp on Nov 29, 2005 12:09:43 GMT -6
Well Well Well...Isnt this something!!... Their drillhole encountered kimberlite, but the extent of sampling currently is unknown. Currently.. Can you say LOCKED in a warehouse hmmmmmmmmmm yep.. and i believe we have a deal with shore, and since last jan. |
|
|
|
Post by doubleplatinum on Nov 29, 2005 12:59:36 GMT -6
Excellent. I think there IS something more to this. For a revoked company to be mentioned, it means its not the end for CMKX or value that we have within the company. Shore Gold is recognizing it. Could we be hooked with them somehow? I would like to think so. Maybe a deal to sell out for a cash dividend. I could see that.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxed on Nov 29, 2005 13:24:11 GMT -6
Well Well Well...Isnt this something!!... Their drillhole encountered kimberlite, but the extent of sampling currently is unknown. Currently.. Can you say LOCKED in a warehouse hmmmmmmmmmm yep.. and i believe we have a deal with shore, and since last jan. And some did not believe Melvin when he said that. Now it is common knowledge. Most of the drill samples were never sent to the lab. Melvin told us that the geologist said they were the best samples he had seen in his 20 years as a geologist. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by harvscorvette on Nov 29, 2005 13:36:49 GMT -6
WHat section were we CMKX was mentioned? In the Shoregold 6k
harvscorvette
|
|
|
|
Post by stockcrazy on Nov 29, 2005 13:45:44 GMT -6
WHat section were we CMKX was mentioned? In the Shoregold 6k harvscorvette it is at the bottom of page 25 |
|
|
|
Post by holdnolonger on Nov 29, 2005 13:52:19 GMT -6
Well Well Well...Isnt this something!!... Their drillhole encountered kimberlite, but the extent of sampling currently is unknown. Currently.. Can you say LOCKED in a warehouse hmmmmmmmmmm Yee haw!! but no effort has been made to substantially sample the kimberlite. Why oh why. hee hee. I'm love'n this. Deals are on the way. Already put in writing many months ago. |
|
|
|
Post by floyd on Nov 29, 2005 14:56:05 GMT -6
Whoo hooo... Getting back another time to my Ford dealer for my GT... This time I'll tell him to reserve it for the next 6 months, just to make sure hehehe
Floyd
|
|
|
|
Post by wwjdthrume on Nov 29, 2005 14:57:15 GMT -6
Also our two microdiamonds were from a sample that was NOT stated to be kimberlite. On the mining report on file with the SEC it shows a table and those microdiamonds are from a sample not listed as kimberlite.
Microdiamonds in the soil? Would suggest to our enemies it was salted? Or to me that they didn't know it was there and there are just too many diamonds around to get all the soil samples without them.
IMO-Debi
|
|
|
|
Post by pjannetto on Nov 29, 2005 15:03:05 GMT -6
Whoo hooo... Getting back another time to my Ford dealer for my GT... This time I'll tell him to reserve it for the next 6 months, just to make sure hehehe Floyd Floyd, You and me both! Do you think if we order at the same time we'll get a deal? Like two for the price of one! We can then split the savings. |
|
|
|
Post by urbanswarrior on Nov 29, 2005 15:30:42 GMT -6
Well Well Well...Isnt this something!!... Their drillhole encountered kimberlite, but the extent of sampling currently is unknown. Currently.. Can you say LOCKED in a warehouse hmmmmmmmmmm yep.. and i believe we have a deal with shore, and since last jan. Bingo Tramp!...And did you notice the same thing was in the entourage 8k!!!.... This is being done right before our eyes...sorta of like ok Boys....You dont wanna play ball....We will club you with the bat!!....Go IBM...Go URBAN... |
|
|
|
Post by cashcowmoo on Nov 29, 2005 15:39:39 GMT -6
i remember them when they were talking about TDEM and the magnetic surveys and how CMKX was looking for diamonds in non magnetic areas.....looks like they found what they were looking for.
question is....CMKX has no real money right now right? i mean SERIOUS money.....im thinking in order to do BULK sampling or the next step they need that settlement money to come in so they can finance a diamond mine.
you think?
|
|
