Post by favorofg on Feb 14, 2008 11:12:25 GMT -6
CHRISTOPHER STORY: U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDERS PRESIDENT BUSH TO PAY
EARLY REPORTS SUGGEST THAT BUSH DEFIED THE SUPREME COURT
Thursday 14 February 2008 07:01
JUSTICES VOTE AGAINST THE PRESIDENT FOR THE FIRST TIME, AT LONG LAST
THE PRECISE EVOLUTION OF THE G-8(9) SANCTIONS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for our 'Wantagate' reports since April 2006.
• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intelligence titles as they are published.
• FORTHCOMING WANTAGATE ISSUE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: We are preparing a very extensive issue of the financial journal in which every stage of this crisis since June last year will be displayed. This issue will be mailed to subscribers worldwide in the first quarter of this year, and will provide a permanent record, which cannot be expunged, of the multiple twists and turns of this historically unprecedented criminalism crisis, with every sordid detail recorded both for immediate further enlightenment, for future study, and for posterity.
Not a single facet of this hideous crisis has been left out of the record, so that no attempt to cover up what has been going on, is possible. Subscribers will receive their issues under their current arrangements. Others who wish to receive this special issue should use the Contact Us facility on this website to ask for details and specify how many copies of this huge report/issue they would like to receive. Book early while stocks last. We will not be sending free copies: details on request. Order your copy EARLY! This is such a huge udnertaking that we have to restrict the print run.
• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story's ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Our Wantagate reports have been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta's Settlement.
• This is the 95th Wantagate report: over a million words to date.
• BOOKS: ‘The Red Terror in Russia’, by Sergey Melgounov, is published by Edward Harle Limited and available via this combined website. It describes what the Dark Forces pulled off in Russia, and what they may have in mind for the United States and Britain (a.k.a. ‘the Main Enemy’) if we do not pull ourselves together. See also the Editor’s 740-PAGE book ‘The New Underworld Order’, for the detailed background on the World Revolution crisis that we are all living through.
• Note: Kindly keep on not shooting the messenger. The following report is based upon our best information and belief. If matters turn out differently, or the timeframe changes, as has occurred since 9th February, this will reflect developments AFTER collection of the intelligence contained herein. We have flies on walls all over the place, but sometimes they may be on the wrong walls, or the right walls at the wrong time. Abusive, rude and anonymous emails are forwarded to a separate box and are held with the option of exposing their provenance should we so decide. Which we may.
U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.
GROUP OF NINE SANCTIONS UPDATE
On 11th February, the Editor received the following message timed at 02:27am UK time:
‘I can affirm that my intel people are saying that sanctions [against the United States, imposed by the Group of ‘Nine’ countries] will go into effect on Tuesday if be aren’t paid by 6.00pm New York time tomorrow. The sanctions seem dramatic, but I am assured by three sources that they are real’.
On 12th February the Editor received the following from a source very closely connected with the settlements. The message, timed as received by us in UK at 20:08pm stated that ‘your Updates are consistent with what my intelligence and high officials are telling me. There definitely are sanctions being launched. My intel informed me a few minutes ago that his operatives at the highest intel level are going into a high-level meeting regarding the sanctions [imposed by the G-8(9) countries and they will get back to me as soon as it concludes’.
The same source had emailed on 12th February (received by us at 1:42am): ‘Thanks for your three Updates. Very informative and pretty accurate as far as I have been able to ascertain. My intel are checking our ‘company’ and military contacts to see if our forces over here are, in fact, on alert for what you and others are predicting’.
SUPREME COURT ORDERED BUSH TO PAY AND HE DIDN’T
At 03:26am on 14th February, the Editor received the following message from the source: ‘It has been a horrendous day. My intelligence & official sources inform me that the meeting referenced previously was a meeting of the US Supreme Court and other high officials, and, last night, they voted against Bush Jr. and ordered him to pay. Of course, that didn’t happen and I’m now told that are moving to force his hand’. We are also advised that ‘several power groups in the United States are taking very serious action’.
In the past couple of days we have received several poisonous emails from people who appear to be sitting on their brains and who have foolishly pointed out that what we mentioned in the recent earlier reports ‘didn’t happen’, so that, accordingly, what we reported was inaccurate. It was and is not inaccurate. As stated at the beginning of the last several reports, shooting the messenger is inadvisable because the messenger has a detailed record of every single piece of information and its provenance on file. The messenger also pointed out that the situation is fluid, and so subject to change almost immediately a report has been posted. People with common sense and discernment understand this. ‘Useful Idiots’ and those who are apoplectic with fury because we have exposed this criminality (and by implication their complicity in it) don’t, or choose not to.
THE TIMING OF THE SANCTIONS AND DE FACTO ‘EXTENSIONS’
Concerning the sanctions and their timing, the known facts in the public domain are as follows:
• The Group of Eight (which means effectively nine, as previously explained) agreed (minus the United States) to impose sanctions on the United States if the Lee Wanta Settlement and the other payments are not released immediately. The date on which the release was to have taken place was last Saturday 9th February.
• On that date, Russian military aircraft buzzed the Nimitz as widely publicised. Russia is a member of the Group of Eight and is livid that it has been repeatedly lied to and cravenly double-crossed by the White House.
• The same applies to all the other G-8 countries, including the United Kingdom.
• For unexplained reasons (or rather, the piece of the puzzle may be missing) the deadline for compliance was set at noon EST on Monday 11th February. When that deadline came and went, the four tankers sitting half a day out from Saudi Arabia were ordered not to proceed on to the United States, but to return to their Saudi port.
Interestingly, on 13th February, AFX News Limited reported that the International Energy Agency (IEA) had just stated that ‘volatile geopolitics in the oil producing countries means that stocks must be rebuilt’. The timing of this comment can hardly have been at all fortuitous, although Venezuela’s reported intention to withhold oil deliveries from the United States may have been pertinent.
• The representatives of 160 countries who had been clicking their heels, waiting for settlement since last October, as reported by us earlier, were told to go home. We are not sure who ‘told’ them, but we assume that there was or is some central information source coordinating their responses. They proceeded to prepare for departure. At some stage during the afternoon of Monday 11th February, this request was rescinded, and they were asked to stay for another 48 hours in the United States. They complied with this request.
• The 48 hour ‘extension’ reportedly ‘expired’ at 6.00pm EST on Wednesday, after which the 160 country representatives were going to leave for home, without being paid. The Editor believes that the movements of the 160 country representatives were coordinated with the Group of Eight (9) so that effectively the sanctions specified in the decisions agreed upon on Saturday the 9th February were alleviated until 6.00pm on Wednesday 13th February 2008. Some antagonists have chosen to overlook these facts and to complain that because what was intended to take effect on Wednesday didn’t happen, therefore nothing is true. This is mistaken and mischievous. Everything that has been reported is true to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of posting. This is a fluid and extremely unstable situation, and serious students of the matter have to have their brains in gear, which includes taking the extreme volatility of the situation into account at all times.
SUPREME COURT HAS DECISIVELY DETACHED ITSELF FROM BUSH
As indicated above, on 13th February, the Supreme Court ordered Bush to pay the Wanta and other settlements, having voted against the President. This is consistent with the Casper report to the effect that ‘we are not going down with your sinking ship' [12th February]. Since Casper’s report preceded the meeting referenced here, it appears that the Supreme Court has indeed detached itself from the President twice – first, as indicated in Casper’s report posted on 12th February, and secondly, as indicated through their vote against the President above.
An elaboration, explained to us on 13th February, was that President Bush signed papers with the Supreme Court for ‘packages’ applicable to payees (not related to the Wanta Settlement, which is separate) to be sent out, we believe, on 12th February. Bush then did what he routinely does, i.e. changed his mind. We were informed that this was the SIXTH time he had been through this crude Leninist routine with the Supreme Court over the same matter. Specifically, Bush ordered the said packages to be returned to the Supreme Court, which then, for the FIRST time, refused to accept them. This was probably the context of Casper’s report. (That left the aforesaid ‘packages’ in limbo, presumably inside the delivery system, where the trail ran cold).
PRESIDENT BELIEVES HE IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE SUPREME COURT
At all events, these two indications that the Supreme Court has detached itself from the President, and our knowledge that the President has refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s order dated 12th February, to order the payments on 13th February, reveals definitively (not that anyone could have been in doubt) that the President of the United States believes that he is not subject to the decisions of the Supreme Court applicable specifically to his own conduct.
Not being a constitutional lawyer or expert, the Editor would not know to what extent this stance places George W. Bush in peril of being removed from office, but considered in the context of the other pressures he faces, this refusal to adhere to the Supreme Court’s order would hardly appear to enhance his position. The Group of Eight (or nine) has signed off with the World Court for those listed in our earlier reporting to be arrested, we understand ‘on sight’, should this intransigence over the settlements continue. It has continued. Last night we were authoritatively informed that, failing settlement on 13th, serious consequences will ensue effective from 14th February. We know what these are liable to be, but refrain from specifying them at this juncture.
The future of the 1,500+ DC political figures and associates, whose complicity in this monumental financial corruption was exposed as a consequence of the raids mounted in European centres that we reported for the first time last spring, is also in severe jeopardy, and has been for many months.
PARTIAL INDICATION OF A FURTHER 48-HOUR ‘EXTENSION’
The further complication, received via email timed 14th February 2008, at 03:36, is that one or more special Trustee parties have been asked from the highest level of at least one European State to hang on for a further 48 hours to enable this matter to be resolved (as though this hasn’t happened already), with the Trustees reluctantly agreeing because of certain measures that may now be taken to force payment. The source adds: ‘That of course takes us to Friday and another week of nothing, and Monday is President’s Day, a holiday here’. An interestingly named one, too.
SOME TRUSTEES RESIGN THEIR COMMISSIONS AND GO HOME
On 11th February, we were advised at 10:30am that an associate of a key Trustee had given up waiting and had returned to Germany. On 13th February, we also ascertained that a number of Trustees have resigned. Specifically, three Trustees from Tier Three have resigned, with one returning to Germany and the other two presumed to have left from home also. Additionally, seven Trustees from Tier Five have resigned their assignments. Some of these Trustees were appointed specifically to make payments, obviously on a fee basis about which the Editor has no knowledge. The resignations of these Trustees will mean that the payees for which they were responsible will not be paid. Please do NOT shoot the messenger.
We report what we know and verify: this information has been separately obtained from two sources independently. One would have thought that this development would be quite liable to raise tensions considerably, making life in the White House even more uncomfortable: necessitating the delivery, perhaps, of more crates of scotch to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and Camp David.
U.S. TREASURY’S SYSTEMS HACKED ON MONDAY NIGHT
On Monday night 11th February, the US Treasury’s computer systems were hacked into, causing a crisis which lasted all night. According to our own sources, the matter was resolved, but we cannot ascertain whether funds were stolen, stolen and restored, or simply that the hacking took place but nothing was lost. In answer to the early question that we put, ‘who did it?’, we quite understandably received no answer. But when we asked the further question, considerably later: ‘Was the cyber attack of foreign or domestic origin?’ we were specifically told: ‘domestic origin’.
This is of interest for many reasons, one of which is that if Mr Paulson was there, it would not be necessary to hack into the Treasury’s system, as that serial thief (see preceding reports) could do it himself from inside, or using his special ‘box’ for the purpose.
Which brings us to the Paulson matter.
PAULSON ASSESSMENTS BY INDEPENDENT AMERICAN OBSERVERS
Two extremely perceptive American sources watched the ‘Paulson’ interviews televised on 12th February. The first said to the Editor, completely out of context and with no prompting, at 2.50pm UK time on 13th February: ‘I swear to you that the Paulson I saw on television is not Paulson’.
The second very close contact, whose life speciality is studying ‘humint’ and the behaviour and interactions and linkages of personalities, described the ‘Paulson’ presented for controlled public consumption as lacking the same colour of skin as Paulson, lacking the dark rings under his eyes, and noting many other discrepancies from the ‘Paulson’ we know and love.
On 13th February 2008 a message timed at 23:13 and labelled ‘Paulson appearance today – NOT’ was received by us, which reads as follows:
‘I was in a coffee shop this afternoon and I believe they had MSNBC on TV. They were doing a segment on the economic outlook and yakking about the housing market. There in living color was a man alleged to be Paulson, but clearly to my recollection was not. I’m saying, not even close. He was talking, answering questions and making comments, and his eyes were blinking faster than the words coming out from his mouth. He looked very uncomfortable energetically, not at all like a man who’s job it is to do such things. Where did they get this guy? Hollywood Screen Actors’ Guild?’
Not far wrong, there. In the first place, we have referenced the three known make-up artists who are contracted by the CIA to handle such crisis situations. Secondly, the United States is unique in having a sort of industry of ‘doubles’ who hire themselves out, or are available on a list via an agency, for use as stand-ins to replicate prominent personages.
Those in the know, know that this is well known. Those not in the know, don't.
It will also have been observed from various TV presentations, including the State of the Union event, that the cameras trained on Paulson do not go full frontal, or when they do (as when the President was walking after his State of the Union Speech and shaking hands), the ‘Paulson’ is half obscured, on purpose. We rely upon our detailed report dated 9th January 2008 for all the other factors, especially the sourcing of the original reports; and we note that, to this day, not a single statement that we have EVER posted on this website since the Wantagate crisis erupted, has ever been denied by a US official source. The reason these things have never been officially denied is that they cannot be, as they have been true as posted. The State Department reported that Paulson was dead and never retracted that report, which we have sourced and referenced.
If that was untrue, the error has never been corrected by the US authorities. It would be odd, to say the least, if they did so at this late stage.
PREDICTIONS UNSAFE GIVEN EXTREME CRISIS VOLATILITY
Given the extreme volatility of the situation, one further dimension of which is a huge build-up in Afghanistan, no prediction of the overall outcome can be made with confidence at this stage. But we can note such important fundamental evidence as the blog report by a UA Cargo agent timed at 6:37pm on 11th February 2008 which appeared on that weird website with a jet black background calling itself www.godlikeproductions, which was acquired by the Agency at some stage in the past, and can observe with interest that, notwithstanding this provenance, it stated:
'Hi folks: Seemingly there is at least a bit of truth here [how kind, implying that 'a little bit' of what we stated is true: so patronising! and referring to our listing of the sanctions agreed by the G-8 against the United States]: I work for UA cargo (export) at the East Coast and some minutes ago, 6:01 EST I received a priority message to all stations: immediately reject ALL cargo bookings for all EU, JAP and CAN destinations starting February 15th, 12 am EST. No further information given. Already booked cargo should be returned’.
Relevant European countries, Japan and Canada are G-8/10 members.
You can make what you like of that: but it seems quite clear from this and the other evidence that, despite the several ‘extensions’ that have occurred since the G-8(9) agreed their strategy on 9th February, and signed off with the World Court to that effect, ‘normal service’ is NOT about to be resumed. If you don’t want to believe it, that’s your problem, not ours. Keep it to yourself, please.
We just report, which is what messengers do.
WANTAGATE FILE DATA, INCLUDING STATUTES AND S.E.C. RULES FLOUTED BY THE CROOKS:
CITIBANK MUST PAY $350 BILLION+ INTEREST UNDER U.C.C. REGULATIONS
Uniform Commercial Code: Article 4A – Funds Transfer: Section 4A-305:
LIABILITY FOR LATE OR IMPROPER EXECUTION OR FAILURE TO EXECUTE PAYMENT ORDER:
(a) If a funds transfer is completed but execution of a payment order by the receiving bank… results in delay in payment to the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest… to the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the improper execution.
As stated in our report dated 4th October, we then calculated that the amount of interest payable to the beneficiary by Citibank, given its delay in paying out the diverted funds since June 2006, was around $350 billion. This amount is rising BY THE DAY, and is now approaching $400 billion.
• [As we revealed at the time] Citibank ‘agreed’ to pay $352 billion by way of interest, following our publication of the above statements. However, the Editor, not being a banker, merely made a rough guestimate at the amount of interest payable by Citibank, consequent upon its criminal frustration and diversion of the Settlement funds since June 2006.
• The actual amount of interest payable by Citibank as an interest penalty, if calculated on the basis of overnight rates, might approximate well over $1.0 trillion. So the institution, having been made aware of our posting dated 1st November, grabbed the Editor’s rough estimate of $350 billion, and added a couple of billion on to make the figure look different. ENDS.
YOU CAN ORDER WANTAGATE ISSUES OF OUR FINANCIAL JOURNAL AS A PACKAGE
We sell, as a special package, the relevant recent back issues of International Currency Review, containing a massive amount of information and back-up documentation, for a flat fee of $750.00, payable in advance. Please use the CONTACT US facility to place your order and send check to the London office: World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom. Orders may also be emailed direct to the Editor at: cstory@worldreports.org.
• Another way of ordering this package is to (a) forward us a CONTACT US email requesting the package, and then (b) to order International Currency Review via the ultra-safe ordering facility at the World Reports Limited section of this website.
• Please state in the CONTACT US facility that you have ordered International Currency Review but that you specifically want to receive the Wantagate package only.
• Editor's Note: We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated people seeking documentation to 'back up' what we publish in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues of International Currency Review [SEE ABOVE] which contain hundreds of pages of facsimiles of relevant documents. Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make these volumes available free of charge.
• However copies are available in many university and other libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered via this website at any time. But the main point here is that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge of the background, which is that an immense volume of relevant documents has been published in our printed intelligence services.
fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php?q=1203006310
EARLY REPORTS SUGGEST THAT BUSH DEFIED THE SUPREME COURT
Thursday 14 February 2008 07:01
JUSTICES VOTE AGAINST THE PRESIDENT FOR THE FIRST TIME, AT LONG LAST
THE PRECISE EVOLUTION OF THE G-8(9) SANCTIONS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for our 'Wantagate' reports since April 2006.
• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intelligence titles as they are published.
• FORTHCOMING WANTAGATE ISSUE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: We are preparing a very extensive issue of the financial journal in which every stage of this crisis since June last year will be displayed. This issue will be mailed to subscribers worldwide in the first quarter of this year, and will provide a permanent record, which cannot be expunged, of the multiple twists and turns of this historically unprecedented criminalism crisis, with every sordid detail recorded both for immediate further enlightenment, for future study, and for posterity.
Not a single facet of this hideous crisis has been left out of the record, so that no attempt to cover up what has been going on, is possible. Subscribers will receive their issues under their current arrangements. Others who wish to receive this special issue should use the Contact Us facility on this website to ask for details and specify how many copies of this huge report/issue they would like to receive. Book early while stocks last. We will not be sending free copies: details on request. Order your copy EARLY! This is such a huge udnertaking that we have to restrict the print run.
• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story's ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Our Wantagate reports have been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta's Settlement.
• This is the 95th Wantagate report: over a million words to date.
• BOOKS: ‘The Red Terror in Russia’, by Sergey Melgounov, is published by Edward Harle Limited and available via this combined website. It describes what the Dark Forces pulled off in Russia, and what they may have in mind for the United States and Britain (a.k.a. ‘the Main Enemy’) if we do not pull ourselves together. See also the Editor’s 740-PAGE book ‘The New Underworld Order’, for the detailed background on the World Revolution crisis that we are all living through.
• Note: Kindly keep on not shooting the messenger. The following report is based upon our best information and belief. If matters turn out differently, or the timeframe changes, as has occurred since 9th February, this will reflect developments AFTER collection of the intelligence contained herein. We have flies on walls all over the place, but sometimes they may be on the wrong walls, or the right walls at the wrong time. Abusive, rude and anonymous emails are forwarded to a separate box and are held with the option of exposing their provenance should we so decide. Which we may.
U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.
GROUP OF NINE SANCTIONS UPDATE
On 11th February, the Editor received the following message timed at 02:27am UK time:
‘I can affirm that my intel people are saying that sanctions [against the United States, imposed by the Group of ‘Nine’ countries] will go into effect on Tuesday if be aren’t paid by 6.00pm New York time tomorrow. The sanctions seem dramatic, but I am assured by three sources that they are real’.
On 12th February the Editor received the following from a source very closely connected with the settlements. The message, timed as received by us in UK at 20:08pm stated that ‘your Updates are consistent with what my intelligence and high officials are telling me. There definitely are sanctions being launched. My intel informed me a few minutes ago that his operatives at the highest intel level are going into a high-level meeting regarding the sanctions [imposed by the G-8(9) countries and they will get back to me as soon as it concludes’.
The same source had emailed on 12th February (received by us at 1:42am): ‘Thanks for your three Updates. Very informative and pretty accurate as far as I have been able to ascertain. My intel are checking our ‘company’ and military contacts to see if our forces over here are, in fact, on alert for what you and others are predicting’.
SUPREME COURT ORDERED BUSH TO PAY AND HE DIDN’T
At 03:26am on 14th February, the Editor received the following message from the source: ‘It has been a horrendous day. My intelligence & official sources inform me that the meeting referenced previously was a meeting of the US Supreme Court and other high officials, and, last night, they voted against Bush Jr. and ordered him to pay. Of course, that didn’t happen and I’m now told that are moving to force his hand’. We are also advised that ‘several power groups in the United States are taking very serious action’.
In the past couple of days we have received several poisonous emails from people who appear to be sitting on their brains and who have foolishly pointed out that what we mentioned in the recent earlier reports ‘didn’t happen’, so that, accordingly, what we reported was inaccurate. It was and is not inaccurate. As stated at the beginning of the last several reports, shooting the messenger is inadvisable because the messenger has a detailed record of every single piece of information and its provenance on file. The messenger also pointed out that the situation is fluid, and so subject to change almost immediately a report has been posted. People with common sense and discernment understand this. ‘Useful Idiots’ and those who are apoplectic with fury because we have exposed this criminality (and by implication their complicity in it) don’t, or choose not to.
THE TIMING OF THE SANCTIONS AND DE FACTO ‘EXTENSIONS’
Concerning the sanctions and their timing, the known facts in the public domain are as follows:
• The Group of Eight (which means effectively nine, as previously explained) agreed (minus the United States) to impose sanctions on the United States if the Lee Wanta Settlement and the other payments are not released immediately. The date on which the release was to have taken place was last Saturday 9th February.
• On that date, Russian military aircraft buzzed the Nimitz as widely publicised. Russia is a member of the Group of Eight and is livid that it has been repeatedly lied to and cravenly double-crossed by the White House.
• The same applies to all the other G-8 countries, including the United Kingdom.
• For unexplained reasons (or rather, the piece of the puzzle may be missing) the deadline for compliance was set at noon EST on Monday 11th February. When that deadline came and went, the four tankers sitting half a day out from Saudi Arabia were ordered not to proceed on to the United States, but to return to their Saudi port.
Interestingly, on 13th February, AFX News Limited reported that the International Energy Agency (IEA) had just stated that ‘volatile geopolitics in the oil producing countries means that stocks must be rebuilt’. The timing of this comment can hardly have been at all fortuitous, although Venezuela’s reported intention to withhold oil deliveries from the United States may have been pertinent.
• The representatives of 160 countries who had been clicking their heels, waiting for settlement since last October, as reported by us earlier, were told to go home. We are not sure who ‘told’ them, but we assume that there was or is some central information source coordinating their responses. They proceeded to prepare for departure. At some stage during the afternoon of Monday 11th February, this request was rescinded, and they were asked to stay for another 48 hours in the United States. They complied with this request.
• The 48 hour ‘extension’ reportedly ‘expired’ at 6.00pm EST on Wednesday, after which the 160 country representatives were going to leave for home, without being paid. The Editor believes that the movements of the 160 country representatives were coordinated with the Group of Eight (9) so that effectively the sanctions specified in the decisions agreed upon on Saturday the 9th February were alleviated until 6.00pm on Wednesday 13th February 2008. Some antagonists have chosen to overlook these facts and to complain that because what was intended to take effect on Wednesday didn’t happen, therefore nothing is true. This is mistaken and mischievous. Everything that has been reported is true to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of posting. This is a fluid and extremely unstable situation, and serious students of the matter have to have their brains in gear, which includes taking the extreme volatility of the situation into account at all times.
SUPREME COURT HAS DECISIVELY DETACHED ITSELF FROM BUSH
As indicated above, on 13th February, the Supreme Court ordered Bush to pay the Wanta and other settlements, having voted against the President. This is consistent with the Casper report to the effect that ‘we are not going down with your sinking ship' [12th February]. Since Casper’s report preceded the meeting referenced here, it appears that the Supreme Court has indeed detached itself from the President twice – first, as indicated in Casper’s report posted on 12th February, and secondly, as indicated through their vote against the President above.
An elaboration, explained to us on 13th February, was that President Bush signed papers with the Supreme Court for ‘packages’ applicable to payees (not related to the Wanta Settlement, which is separate) to be sent out, we believe, on 12th February. Bush then did what he routinely does, i.e. changed his mind. We were informed that this was the SIXTH time he had been through this crude Leninist routine with the Supreme Court over the same matter. Specifically, Bush ordered the said packages to be returned to the Supreme Court, which then, for the FIRST time, refused to accept them. This was probably the context of Casper’s report. (That left the aforesaid ‘packages’ in limbo, presumably inside the delivery system, where the trail ran cold).
PRESIDENT BELIEVES HE IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE SUPREME COURT
At all events, these two indications that the Supreme Court has detached itself from the President, and our knowledge that the President has refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s order dated 12th February, to order the payments on 13th February, reveals definitively (not that anyone could have been in doubt) that the President of the United States believes that he is not subject to the decisions of the Supreme Court applicable specifically to his own conduct.
Not being a constitutional lawyer or expert, the Editor would not know to what extent this stance places George W. Bush in peril of being removed from office, but considered in the context of the other pressures he faces, this refusal to adhere to the Supreme Court’s order would hardly appear to enhance his position. The Group of Eight (or nine) has signed off with the World Court for those listed in our earlier reporting to be arrested, we understand ‘on sight’, should this intransigence over the settlements continue. It has continued. Last night we were authoritatively informed that, failing settlement on 13th, serious consequences will ensue effective from 14th February. We know what these are liable to be, but refrain from specifying them at this juncture.
The future of the 1,500+ DC political figures and associates, whose complicity in this monumental financial corruption was exposed as a consequence of the raids mounted in European centres that we reported for the first time last spring, is also in severe jeopardy, and has been for many months.
PARTIAL INDICATION OF A FURTHER 48-HOUR ‘EXTENSION’
The further complication, received via email timed 14th February 2008, at 03:36, is that one or more special Trustee parties have been asked from the highest level of at least one European State to hang on for a further 48 hours to enable this matter to be resolved (as though this hasn’t happened already), with the Trustees reluctantly agreeing because of certain measures that may now be taken to force payment. The source adds: ‘That of course takes us to Friday and another week of nothing, and Monday is President’s Day, a holiday here’. An interestingly named one, too.
SOME TRUSTEES RESIGN THEIR COMMISSIONS AND GO HOME
On 11th February, we were advised at 10:30am that an associate of a key Trustee had given up waiting and had returned to Germany. On 13th February, we also ascertained that a number of Trustees have resigned. Specifically, three Trustees from Tier Three have resigned, with one returning to Germany and the other two presumed to have left from home also. Additionally, seven Trustees from Tier Five have resigned their assignments. Some of these Trustees were appointed specifically to make payments, obviously on a fee basis about which the Editor has no knowledge. The resignations of these Trustees will mean that the payees for which they were responsible will not be paid. Please do NOT shoot the messenger.
We report what we know and verify: this information has been separately obtained from two sources independently. One would have thought that this development would be quite liable to raise tensions considerably, making life in the White House even more uncomfortable: necessitating the delivery, perhaps, of more crates of scotch to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and Camp David.
U.S. TREASURY’S SYSTEMS HACKED ON MONDAY NIGHT
On Monday night 11th February, the US Treasury’s computer systems were hacked into, causing a crisis which lasted all night. According to our own sources, the matter was resolved, but we cannot ascertain whether funds were stolen, stolen and restored, or simply that the hacking took place but nothing was lost. In answer to the early question that we put, ‘who did it?’, we quite understandably received no answer. But when we asked the further question, considerably later: ‘Was the cyber attack of foreign or domestic origin?’ we were specifically told: ‘domestic origin’.
This is of interest for many reasons, one of which is that if Mr Paulson was there, it would not be necessary to hack into the Treasury’s system, as that serial thief (see preceding reports) could do it himself from inside, or using his special ‘box’ for the purpose.
Which brings us to the Paulson matter.
PAULSON ASSESSMENTS BY INDEPENDENT AMERICAN OBSERVERS
Two extremely perceptive American sources watched the ‘Paulson’ interviews televised on 12th February. The first said to the Editor, completely out of context and with no prompting, at 2.50pm UK time on 13th February: ‘I swear to you that the Paulson I saw on television is not Paulson’.
The second very close contact, whose life speciality is studying ‘humint’ and the behaviour and interactions and linkages of personalities, described the ‘Paulson’ presented for controlled public consumption as lacking the same colour of skin as Paulson, lacking the dark rings under his eyes, and noting many other discrepancies from the ‘Paulson’ we know and love.
On 13th February 2008 a message timed at 23:13 and labelled ‘Paulson appearance today – NOT’ was received by us, which reads as follows:
‘I was in a coffee shop this afternoon and I believe they had MSNBC on TV. They were doing a segment on the economic outlook and yakking about the housing market. There in living color was a man alleged to be Paulson, but clearly to my recollection was not. I’m saying, not even close. He was talking, answering questions and making comments, and his eyes were blinking faster than the words coming out from his mouth. He looked very uncomfortable energetically, not at all like a man who’s job it is to do such things. Where did they get this guy? Hollywood Screen Actors’ Guild?’
Not far wrong, there. In the first place, we have referenced the three known make-up artists who are contracted by the CIA to handle such crisis situations. Secondly, the United States is unique in having a sort of industry of ‘doubles’ who hire themselves out, or are available on a list via an agency, for use as stand-ins to replicate prominent personages.
Those in the know, know that this is well known. Those not in the know, don't.
It will also have been observed from various TV presentations, including the State of the Union event, that the cameras trained on Paulson do not go full frontal, or when they do (as when the President was walking after his State of the Union Speech and shaking hands), the ‘Paulson’ is half obscured, on purpose. We rely upon our detailed report dated 9th January 2008 for all the other factors, especially the sourcing of the original reports; and we note that, to this day, not a single statement that we have EVER posted on this website since the Wantagate crisis erupted, has ever been denied by a US official source. The reason these things have never been officially denied is that they cannot be, as they have been true as posted. The State Department reported that Paulson was dead and never retracted that report, which we have sourced and referenced.
If that was untrue, the error has never been corrected by the US authorities. It would be odd, to say the least, if they did so at this late stage.
PREDICTIONS UNSAFE GIVEN EXTREME CRISIS VOLATILITY
Given the extreme volatility of the situation, one further dimension of which is a huge build-up in Afghanistan, no prediction of the overall outcome can be made with confidence at this stage. But we can note such important fundamental evidence as the blog report by a UA Cargo agent timed at 6:37pm on 11th February 2008 which appeared on that weird website with a jet black background calling itself www.godlikeproductions, which was acquired by the Agency at some stage in the past, and can observe with interest that, notwithstanding this provenance, it stated:
'Hi folks: Seemingly there is at least a bit of truth here [how kind, implying that 'a little bit' of what we stated is true: so patronising! and referring to our listing of the sanctions agreed by the G-8 against the United States]: I work for UA cargo (export) at the East Coast and some minutes ago, 6:01 EST I received a priority message to all stations: immediately reject ALL cargo bookings for all EU, JAP and CAN destinations starting February 15th, 12 am EST. No further information given. Already booked cargo should be returned’.
Relevant European countries, Japan and Canada are G-8/10 members.
You can make what you like of that: but it seems quite clear from this and the other evidence that, despite the several ‘extensions’ that have occurred since the G-8(9) agreed their strategy on 9th February, and signed off with the World Court to that effect, ‘normal service’ is NOT about to be resumed. If you don’t want to believe it, that’s your problem, not ours. Keep it to yourself, please.
We just report, which is what messengers do.
WANTAGATE FILE DATA, INCLUDING STATUTES AND S.E.C. RULES FLOUTED BY THE CROOKS:
CITIBANK MUST PAY $350 BILLION+ INTEREST UNDER U.C.C. REGULATIONS
Uniform Commercial Code: Article 4A – Funds Transfer: Section 4A-305:
LIABILITY FOR LATE OR IMPROPER EXECUTION OR FAILURE TO EXECUTE PAYMENT ORDER:
(a) If a funds transfer is completed but execution of a payment order by the receiving bank… results in delay in payment to the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest… to the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the improper execution.
As stated in our report dated 4th October, we then calculated that the amount of interest payable to the beneficiary by Citibank, given its delay in paying out the diverted funds since June 2006, was around $350 billion. This amount is rising BY THE DAY, and is now approaching $400 billion.
• [As we revealed at the time] Citibank ‘agreed’ to pay $352 billion by way of interest, following our publication of the above statements. However, the Editor, not being a banker, merely made a rough guestimate at the amount of interest payable by Citibank, consequent upon its criminal frustration and diversion of the Settlement funds since June 2006.
• The actual amount of interest payable by Citibank as an interest penalty, if calculated on the basis of overnight rates, might approximate well over $1.0 trillion. So the institution, having been made aware of our posting dated 1st November, grabbed the Editor’s rough estimate of $350 billion, and added a couple of billion on to make the figure look different. ENDS.
YOU CAN ORDER WANTAGATE ISSUES OF OUR FINANCIAL JOURNAL AS A PACKAGE
We sell, as a special package, the relevant recent back issues of International Currency Review, containing a massive amount of information and back-up documentation, for a flat fee of $750.00, payable in advance. Please use the CONTACT US facility to place your order and send check to the London office: World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom. Orders may also be emailed direct to the Editor at: cstory@worldreports.org.
• Another way of ordering this package is to (a) forward us a CONTACT US email requesting the package, and then (b) to order International Currency Review via the ultra-safe ordering facility at the World Reports Limited section of this website.
• Please state in the CONTACT US facility that you have ordered International Currency Review but that you specifically want to receive the Wantagate package only.
• Editor's Note: We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated people seeking documentation to 'back up' what we publish in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues of International Currency Review [SEE ABOVE] which contain hundreds of pages of facsimiles of relevant documents. Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make these volumes available free of charge.
• However copies are available in many university and other libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered via this website at any time. But the main point here is that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge of the background, which is that an immense volume of relevant documents has been published in our printed intelligence services.
fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php?q=1203006310